paywall free link:
Judge Sets March 1 Hearing for Final Arguments on Fani Willis Disqualification
I don’t have a lot of confidence in this judge. He may reason that getting Trump, an existential threat to democracy in America, is more important than indiscretions by Fani and Nathan—instead of charging them with perjury he could just give them the benefit of the doubt (bad memories about the exact timeline). If he does decide Fani has to be removed from the case, he may be trying to put in someone who can pick up from where Fani left off (instead of starting over). But I’m not a lawyer and don’t know if that is possible.
Wait, I thought the new model for how these things go was
for the judge to have already made his ruling before the
defendant appeared in court.
(of course, that may be the case, without us being told)