Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

March 1 in Fulton County, Georgia should be an interesting day. I wonder what other information the attorneys for Trump have that confirm an earlier time-line for the affair of Wade and Willis. I think they may be giving Willis enough room to hang herself with perjury charges before providing even more proof to the Court.

paywall free link:

Judge Sets March 1 Hearing for Final Arguments on Fani Willis Disqualification

1 posted on 02/24/2024 5:44:51 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: CFW

I’m betting she will be “vindicated”. There’s no way the deep state isn’t going to threaten, bribe or cajole the judge on this one.


2 posted on 02/24/2024 5:47:20 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

She’s a RAT and she owns the “judges”. This thing is already over. Georgie’s Fatass waddles away free!


4 posted on 02/24/2024 5:48:12 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (John Oliver is a racist liberal biatch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

How many times did this judge visit Frisky Fani ?


5 posted on 02/24/2024 5:49:08 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

The judge should recuse himself and then resign for not disclosing his campaign donations to Willis.

A gang of perjurers try to take down the President of the United States to cover up their election crimes? Better have your ducks in a row.

The entire case should be dismissed and the entire gang - prosecutors, judicial overseers and their political co-conspirators - need to be federally prosecuted.


6 posted on 02/24/2024 5:51:03 AM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Charlie Kirk-——”Attorney for President Trump, Steve Sadow, specifically asked Nathan Wade under oath how many times he’d visited Fani Willis’s residence in 2021:”

SADOW: “So if phone records were to reflect that you were making phone calls from the same location as [Willis’] condo before November 1, 2021 and it was on multiple occasions, the phone records would be wrong?”

WADE: “If the phone records reflected that, yessir.”

They set the perjury trap and Wade walked right into it.


7 posted on 02/24/2024 5:51:26 AM PST by Liz (Political correctness is tyranny with manners. Charlton Heston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Give her the same “due process” they gave Trump. Oh, that’s right-NONE.


10 posted on 02/24/2024 6:08:34 AM PST by Singermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Monday will be another hearing behind closed doors to determine What is covered under the lawyer client privilege

The state turned on Wade’s Friend and ex lawyer late Friday and In doing so may have breached it

you should have seen the look on Terrence Bradley’s face when they stabbed him in the back


11 posted on 02/24/2024 6:10:35 AM PST by janetjanet998 (Legacy media including youtube are the enemy of the people and must die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Trump attorneys may be holding two more cards up their sleeve.

1/If Fani was conflicted, then loverboy was conflicted too. He needs to be removed also.

2/ Since both of them presented the case to the grand jury, that poisoned fruit needs to be thrown out too. Case dismissed.

Real criminals and murderers have been let off with lesser technicalities.

EC


12 posted on 02/24/2024 6:15:34 AM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

You are spot on with your analysis. The defense obviously had these records before the testimony. Watching the questioning now, you see the very specific perjury traps being laid. I think there’s more evidence to come. After the DA’s office and these two idiots respond with their next batch of lies, the defense will drop the next evidentiary bombshell. Absolutely, must watch TV.


13 posted on 02/24/2024 6:19:47 AM PST by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Fat Fani lied under oath, obstructed justice and should be disbarred.

Then should should be sued for defamation by everyone involved for proclaiming her innocence for 50 million, since that is the new norm for what to do based on Trumps cases.


18 posted on 02/24/2024 6:38:10 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Will Fanny be back in front of the black church this Sunday to cry about how she is being set upon by racists?


20 posted on 02/24/2024 6:48:39 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (“Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys” P.J. O’Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
I wonder how the 2019 start to the ‘affair’ claim fits with Wade's divorce case statements, and how his soon to be ex-wife feels about that date. This is disgusting, and that there is even a question of either Willis or Wade continuing to have anything to do with the Trump trial is beyond ridiculous. They should be lucky to keep their law licenses.
22 posted on 02/24/2024 6:59:36 AM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW; All

Apparently, phone records obtained show that the both of them lied under oath.

And I’m kind of confused about she has hoarding and using campaign funds for personal use.


24 posted on 02/24/2024 7:09:31 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

March 1st!!
Can we call it BLACK FRIDAY without being called rayciss?


25 posted on 02/24/2024 7:10:19 AM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
“I wonder what other information the attorneys for Trump have that confirm an earlier time-line for the affair of Wade and Willis.”

Other than the perjury issue, I don't see the importance of the relationship beginning after the hire and not before.

Either way it was totally unprofessional and unethical. If Fani waited until after the hire to set her cap that is as bad, or worse, than her initiating the intimacy prior to the hire.

It is indefensible for a powerful boss to receive sexual favors from a subordinate. Her control of his half-million dollar salary is the very definition of boss supremacy.

As Kamala would say: “Full stop.”

36 posted on 02/24/2024 7:47:14 AM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

How can she proceed if she has been proven to have committed perjury?


40 posted on 02/24/2024 7:56:36 AM PST by silent majority rising (When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Honestly, I can see this going either way.

I am leaning toward nothing happening to her and she will be allowed to continue her lawfare against Trump.

Hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think I am.


41 posted on 02/24/2024 7:57:37 AM PST by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
The judge is waiting for Black History Month to be over before finishing the Willis hearing?

-PJ

51 posted on 02/24/2024 9:19:52 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

So who does Pres. Trump go to to have a hearing on whether Judge McAfee should be disqualified\recused because he once worked under Fani ?


54 posted on 02/24/2024 9:34:35 AM PST by stylin19a (a man at my door asked for a small donation for the local swimming pool. I gave him a glass of water)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

The very fact that the allegations were made, and appear credible, should be disqualifying. A criminal defendant should not have to incur the additional expense of proving the prosecutor is corrupt. It’s an embarrassment to the nation. Justice should not depend on who the judge and prosecutor are, but it does, and very much so.


55 posted on 02/24/2024 9:37:15 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson