I watched the entirety of Day 1 and I am struggling. Willis & Wade seem to be getting away with stonewalling, talking over, rambling without answering the questions and using novel justifications for lying.
In the case of Wade he asserts that he did not lie about having no romantic relationships outside his marriage from the time of the marriage until the 2023 sworn statement because “his marriage ended when his wife had an affair in 2015”. That is irrelevant to the statement that he swore and admits his statement was a perjury.
Willis states that one person saying something makes it a fact. She graduated from law school???
The complete lack of a money trail on the part of an elected official with actions of concern for impropriety carried out for years stretches credibility past breaking and reeks of the intent to hide the couples’ fiscal impropriety. Similarly Wade states he made less money while working for Fulton County but his taxes rebut that allegation.
The judge seems to be on the one hand implying to the attorneys that the untruthfulness has been demonstrated & does not need to be further elucidated and on the other hand protecting Willis.
I hope that the first case is an accurate read of the judge’s view. It will further destroy my belief in the Justice system if this brazen couple is given license to avoid censure by perverting the system.
Get prepared for another letdown by our judicial system.
If you or I said under oath the things she said, we’d both ALREADY be in jail.
“The judge seems to be on the one hand implying to the attorneys that the untruthfulness has been demonstrated & does not need to be further elucidated and on the other hand protecting Willis.
I hope that the first case is an accurate read of the judge’s view. It will further destroy my belief in the Justice system if this brazen couple is given license to avoid censure by perverting the system.”
I think the judge has already decided to disqualify Willis based upon the evidence to date, but is letting the hearing proceed so that the record will be complete.
It is my understanding that if he does disqualify her, the case and any results are simply wiped away as if it never happened, including any plea deals by co-defendants. Any other DA would have to start over from the beginning.
They made it extremely clear that they were lying. Any honest person knows you don’t pay everything in cash, by the tens of thousands of dollars, unless you are hiding income and spending.
However, many people do not care. Will the judge? I’m afraid he’ll bow down so he can stay a judge and not face Fani’s retribution.
The Treason clause in Article III Section 3 requires "the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act."
I guess the message is to not commit treason in Georgia because it only takes one person to make it a fact.
-PJ