“Good grief you are naive. Yes they did. That is all. Not going to continue debating with a naive neocon globalist eager to sallow the liberal propaganda.”
But you haven’t been debating: You’ve produced no supporting documentation to buttress your argument. Timber Rattler HAS produced supporting documentation to support his. Now, you can rebut his claim, and impeach his evidence by producing some of your own to counter it. I await your rebuttal, so I can judge for myself.
I have no need to rebut anything, all the sources he posted are not credible, how about you first provide a credible source before you demand I rebut anything.
You are asking me to rebut his claim but not demanding he first support his. I made no original claim and until actual reputable sources are provided I am under no ethical pressure to provide my sources in rebuttal to a lack of credible sources.
Or is your argument news outlets like CNN are creditable, if so then it is fruitless to discuss anything with you.
So please confirm, do you consider such media propogandist outfits as credible?
Let me add, those same outlets said Russia was collapsing and the ruble falling and Putin a cancer ridden paranoid wearing diapers, literally they reported that stuff. Tucker Carlson smashed that narrative with a sledgehammer, but now you want me and others to believe them about these issues. Literally a fools endeavor.
One data point, the ruble is stronger now than at the beginning of the war, how do you square that circle?
To be clear Putin is evil imo and I prefer both sides not win.