Will Islam take over Europe? It looks likely, under every possible scenario, according to a Pew Research study

Even if all migration into Europe were to immediately and permanently stop -– a “zero migration” scenario -– the Muslim population of Europe still would be expected to rise from current level of 4.9% to 7.4% by the year 2050, according to a 2017 report from Pew Research.

This is because Muslims are younger (by 13 years, on average) and have higher fertility (one child more per woman, on average) than other Europeans, mirroring a global pattern.

This is just the least-migration-filled scenario. The report states that a second, “medium” migration scenario assumes that all refugee flows will stop as of mid-2016 but that recent levels of “regular” migration to Europe will continue (i.e., migration of those who come for reasons other than seeking asylum).

Under these conditions, Muslims could reach 11.2% of Europe’s population in 2050.

Finally, a “high” migration scenario from this report projects the record flow of refugees into Europe between 2014 and 2016 to continue indefinitely into the future with the same religious composition (i.e., mostly made up of Muslims) in addition to the typical annual flow of regular migrants.

In this scenario, Muslims could make up 14% of Europe’s population by 2050 -– nearly triple the current share, but still considerably smaller than the populations of both Christians and people with no religion in Europe.

The refugee flows of the last few years, however, are extremely high compared with the historical average in recent decades, and already have begun to decline as the European Union and many of the member states have made policy changes aimed at limiting refugee flows.

Predicting future migration levels is impossible, because migration rates are connected not only to political and economic conditions outside Europe, but also to the changing economic situation and government policies within Europe.

In a fight between 10 sheep and 2 wolves, which side will prevail?
In a fight between 10 naive, sleepy infidels and 2 ruthless Muslims, which side will prevail?

Either another Charles “The Hammer” Martel appears AND is embraced, or it’s all over but the crying.

Side note: Hungary, the land of my grandparents, has been very good at keeping the invaders out. But all it would take is one bad election. Then the Hungarian border wall comes down. So I’m not optimistic even there.

There was group in soCal called the brown berets. They were soon replaced by active college students. I went to hear a speaker in Cal State Fullerton and saw people setting up the stage after the speaker left. About 1977. Two Mexican guys walked up the aisles and one asked me my name. I said it. It was Italian but they must have thought it was Spanish I guessed I was good to stay at their meeting.

The topic Reconquista. The re-taking of the Southwest by Mexico. Now historically the Spanish took over the US southwest and Mexico only had it for a minute. But who reads history when you have a cause.

The consensus was if more Mexicans came across the border the US Southwest would be Mexican because of demographics and no shots fired. Two of the believers and leaders of Reconquista: the current sect of HHS whom Biden calls Bakaria (Becerra) and Kevin De (the de added to look more Spanish) Leon a Dem pol in California.

Demographics are powerful force. But one restriction on the Mexicans, the Asian population in California. I believe Islam is using the same strategy to conquer the west.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.