Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

The program would be self sustaining if they kept to the original premise:

1. It was a retirement supplement, not a pension.
2. If everyone paid into the system from the first dollar to the last dollar.
3. If they pegged the “retirement age” for those entering the workforce to their life expectancy.

They left those tenants a long time ago.

There is no way that retirement age for an 18 year old is going to max out at 67. There is no way that someone making $300,000 a year shouldn’t be paying the same rate as someone making $50,000.

And stop giving SSI to people with non-disabling issues. Or who haven’t paid into the system.


17 posted on 02/09/2024 9:00:43 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt
I disagree with #2 as SS is currently structured. FICA payroll taxes are capped because the benefits paid in retirement are capped.

There’s no way that someone earning $300,000 should be paying the same rate as someone earning $50,000 if they are both going to be getting paid the same monthly benefit in retirement.

20 posted on 02/09/2024 9:14:44 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson