Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

If he had done that to protect Danish ships flagged in Bermuda or the Cayman Islands.......

Irrelevant. Point is that foreign policy actions don’t require a giant bureaucracy.


24 posted on 02/05/2024 2:20:02 PM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Chad C. Mulligan
Point is that foreign policy actions don’t require a giant bureaucracy.

You might want to read up on the history of U.S. trade and the predations of the Barbary States in the Mediterranean Sea.

The U.S. had an immediate problem with them as soon as we became an independent nation. The British government made it known across the world that they no longer had any obligation to protect our merchant ships. Under the Articles of Confederation, the Federal government was so weak that it couldn’t effectively manage a navy to deal with problems like the Barbary States thousands of miles away. This situation went on for years, even after the Constitution was ratified and Congress had the authority to fund a navy. During that time, the U.S. government was paying tribute to the Barbary pirates because we simply didn’t have the “bureaucracy” in place to deal with them.

26 posted on 02/05/2024 2:45:16 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson