Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j.havenfarm

I agree with you. This is an interim prder pending hearingthe case based on the meriuts of the case, constiotutional law. This interim order is designed to maintain a status quo between the parties before the case is heard and a decision endered.

This is where the court failed, not taing notyice of the tremendous hardship thieir interim order induced on the People of Texas and elsewhere.

THe order does not prohiibit Texas from putting up new wire.

This is the time to protest Biden and his policies,but not the Supreme COurts regular process whichi in my view was a mistake. THe true status qua is to not have illegals enter our nation contrary to the existing law on the books.

Abbot needs to lead this but at the same time it would be good to see The People array themselves and give notice to the Feds and to the State of Texas that they will act to observe, defend and protect the Constitution,the profound duty of every citizen.


12 posted on 01/26/2024 5:24:12 PM PST by Candor7 (Ask not for whom Trum p Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7

AG Paxton letter of 1/26/24

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-refuses-biden-administrations-demand-surrender-shelby-park-and-end?fbclid=IwAR0EEklpMQPI6ruU8Pby21sgtXfioZ51bNZjNA9XaoBJbyob3xs3Vb6gCAs

Note this part:


Instead, you fixate on a recent order from the Supreme Court of the United States. As you know,
that unsigned order supplied no rationale for vacating a Fifth Circuit injunction. It may be that the
Supreme Court was misled by allegations levelled by your federal agency, and which you repeated
in your January 14th letter to our office. In any event, the Court’s order certainly said nothing
about access to Shelby Park, which even the federal government’s lawyers acknowledged is “not
presented” in that ongoing litigation. See Second Supplemental Memorandum at 5, DHS v. Texas,
No. 23A607 (Jan. 15, 2024).”


26 posted on 01/26/2024 6:25:27 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson