Fake photoshops have been around for ages but these new AI-generated deepfakes take it to a whole different level and aren't even comparable. And, of course, like all emerging internet tools, porn is the first place it gets used.
Next, they’ll be showing other shapers of our young female children’s minds and morals like Madonna, desecrating a cross and dressing like a hooker servicing a client, and in satanic promoting skits.
AI-generated images are going to get much worse. I mean, it’s already out there, and since they can so realistic it’ll open a whole realm to pornographers. Pandora’s box has been opened.
The porn industry drives technology.
I have read more than a few articles.
It will be interesting to see who gets sued, and whether successful or not.
The website for hosting likely doesn’t control the AI coding.
What actual person is responsible?
It’s not real, so?...
I didn’t see any links to these pictures/videos to see how realistic they are. Not that I would peek but I’d let my cat look at them and she’d tell me if it was porn or not.
It should be enlightening that this is how humans use a revolution in technology.
They called it “The Information Age” earlier. It is the Age of Imaging. Image generation and, most importantly, recognition.
We will all be wearing Guy Fawkes masks.
Who wants to see some flat chested snotty blonde? I don’t.
Several decades ago I worked with a techie who made several times his corporate salary by working on the side with porn companies (running servers, etc.)
Even further back, I worked with an animation studio, and after hours we’d make extra bucks making the credits for the pornos on 42nd St. We’d have a blast making up fake names.
Lawsuits will not be enough. We are going to need serious prison time. I’d be happy to use the death penalty.
I suspect AI will get to the point very quickly that all nude or semi-nude images can be automatically blocked.
We may reach the point at which no likeness of any person can be posted online without the express, verified consented the person depicted.
The internet would still exist but it would be the domain of words, charts and graphs, and streamed, copyrighted and secure content.
Social media as we have come to know it would be destroyed. Which might be a good thing.
Did they put her face on some pictures of Miley Cyrus taken on stage?
There have been photoshops of the same type of things floating around for ages.
For a long time it has been inevitable that any public figure had to expect that they were going to wind up depicted in some type of generated porn.
There are all kinds of weirdos out there so it could literally be even the public figures that most people think are far too repulsive to even consider imagining.
Someone that knows that they are someone that many people might want to see could put them out there themselves. If its inevitable and it can generate even more publicity then there are those that will do it.
CNN is also disinformation.
Who the hell is Taylor Swift and why should I care!
If Kansas City Chiefs win the Super Bowl the team will be renamed to Kansas City Swifties....
“Thank-you for helping to keep CNN on air. Every hit to our website — even from conservatives — puts money in our pocket.”