Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Vows to Defend Its Sovereignty, Oppose SCOTUS Ruling
The New American ^ | January 23, 2024 | David Kelly

Posted on 01/23/2024 1:39:42 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to defend the sovereignty of the State of Texas after the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday permitting Border Patrol agents to resume destroying concertina wire barriers placed along the Rio Grande riverbank. 

The justices, by a 5-4 vote, granted the emergency appeal from the Biden administration which, according to the Patriot Post, argued “that Texas was — get this — preventing the Border Patrol from doing its duty. That duty, last we checked, was to keep illegals from entering the country.” 

“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Attorney General Paxton said in a press release on Monday. “The destruction of Texas’s border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.” 

Texas had placed the razor-wire fencing along the riverbank as part Governor Greg Abbott’s Operation Lone Star to offset President Biden’s “reckless open border policies” that created the ongoing border crisis, allowing record numbers of illegal immigrants and deadly drugs to pour into the nation. 

According to Epoch Times, the Biden administration argued before the high court:  

“Like other law-enforcement officers, Border Patrol agents operating under difficult circumstances at the border must make context-dependent, sometimes split-second decisions about how to enforce federal immigration laws while maintaining public safety,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote to the Supreme Court. “But the injunction prohibits agents from passing through or moving physical obstacles erected by the State that prevent access to the very border they are charged with...


(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: border; illegalruling; invasion; nationalsecurity; security; sovereignty; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: redgolum

Not true.

The Supreme court did not rule in the case it reversed the lower courts injunction. A temporary issue, until the Court acts on the merit of the facts.

But it does show that some of the Supreme Court Justices are compromised.


41 posted on 01/23/2024 5:51:58 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Slavery was ruled Constitutional in the Dredd Scott decision. It’s clear that the Federal government’s limited role is protecting the border. This is an invasion that’s being allowed. Treason!


42 posted on 01/25/2024 4:22:27 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson