Posted on 01/21/2024 7:15:31 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Ever since January 6, 2021, Darren Beattie has been investigating the events of that day with the persistence of a bloodhound on the scent. One of the narratives that’s kept his attention is the story of pipe bombs found at the RNC and DNC headquarters. Intriguingly, while the FBI has managed to use cell phones and videos to capture every grandma from Dubuque who set foot near the Capitol building, it’s been completely unable to catch that pipe bomber. According to Battie, that’s because the government already knows who set the pipe bomb: The government itself.
Beattie appeared on Tucker Carlson to dissect newly-released video of the scene and to explain why he believes the pipe bomb narrative is a hoax meant to discredit Trump supporters by implying that they unsuccessfully tried to blow up institutions hostile to Donald Trump (i.e., not just the DNC but also the RNC). Beattie makes a very good case.
It seems likely that government officials were involved in planting pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of an effort to keep Donald Trump from running for president again. Darren Beattie has details. pic.twitter.com/jsM5jCDeBd — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 18, 2024
The video footage, shot on January 6 by a camera installed across the street from the pertinent events, shows two SUVs parked right next to the DNC bench near which one of the pipe bombs was found. One SUV belongs to the D.C. cops, and one to the Secret Service. According to Beattie, they were working jointly on security that day.
In the video, we see a man wearing a backpack appear on the lower right side of the screen. Walking at a leisurely pace, he approaches the D.C. police, leans into the driver’s side window, and talks to someone.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
They knew it was harmless enough to let kids walk by it.
Of course the government placed it. Is there anyone who trusts the government anymore.
Of course the government placed it. Is there anyone who trusts the government anymore.
Yes. As the article states:
Kamala Harris, the Vice President of the United States was in the DNC building. Moreover, the alleged bomb is within roughly 10 yards of the two SUVs. According to the DHS, ten yards is not far enough for safety:
If any type of bomb is suspected, typical recommendations are to keep all people at a minimum evacuation distance until authorized bomb disposal personnel arrive. For a pipe bomb, the US Department of Homeland Security recommends a minimum of 21 m (69 ft), and an outdoors distance of 366 m (1,201 ft).
Instead, a minute or so goes by while nothing happens. Then, police officers and Secret Service agents emerge at a leisurely pace from the SUVs and kind of stand around. A group of school children walks within feet of what law enforcement has been told is a pipe bomb, and the officers and agents do nothing at all. One of them eventually walks over and takes a photo of the pipe that may be a bomb. Only later does a robot defuse it.
Curious, but the above is only circumstantial evidence.
BFL
What is the story with the cameras for this footage? The article just says that they were ‘installed across the street’. Were these part of the guvmint video that Speaker Johnston got released? Or was this video from sources that had nothing to do with guvmint? Cameras on the traffic light post? The angle of the shot looks like is coming from the direction of the Fairchild Bldg. Correct me if I’m wrong but that’s not a guvmint building......
The guy that set the bombs in place, stopped by the car
and talked momentarily with the officers.
(I watched the video a few days ago, and this is what I
remember of it. Kids were allowed to go by, and Kamala
wasn’t all that far away.
They would never have exposed her to that level of a
threat.
They claim that the bombs were placed on Jan5 the day before, and showed a video of someone wearing a light colored hoodie (who looked rather feminine to me) who they allege planted at least one of them. Presumably not the same person who wore a backpack and talked to cops on Jan 6.
But if that was the case, the bombs would have to have been set to go off on Jan 5 , because they only had 1 HR timers. They weren’t really hidden either, so if they were out there on the 5th why weren’t they found on the 5th?
This makes me wonder if the bombs were laid out on the 6th by the DC cops or by some fed , maybe the guy with the backpack at the DNC, and the woman from Minneapolis or whatever who worked at Treasury and claims to have found the one by the RNC.
The video I saw showed this guy with two devices. He had them
in a backpack, and placed them. Then he showed up at the
car and talked to the people in the car.
I didn’t know what to make of it, being the first time I
had heard of it. That’s what I saw though.
You know, they frequently show different lengths of the
videos like this. Some leave important stuff out. I’m
not sure which versions you and I saw, if there is in fact
different versions. Just trying to explain what I saw.
Short answer is ,yes.
part of thier plan
.
Yes. Yes, they did.
The bombs were clearly fake. They were planted at midnight, with 1 hour mechanical kitchen timers, both set at around 20 minutes. The latest possible time for them to detonate would have been 20 minutes after midnight. However, the timers didn’t work at all. They would never detonate, even if they were real bombs.
They clearly were intended to be ‘found’ about 20 minutes before the rally. Unfortunately (for Pelosi), one was actually found by a real passerby too early. before the plant could find them. That meant the ‘bomb plot’ had to be cancelled.
Bogino gave a cogent and logical examination of this using the video and his experience. It comes down to that the Democrats and LE planted it to further justify the attacks on the Republican protesters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.