Posted on 01/19/2024 2:43:01 PM PST by MeganC
You’re hallucinating again, Jon-Boy
Putin can’t even get more than 15% of Ukraine, after 2 years and having 140,000 Russian troops killed
FAIL
21 posts and the Putin Pep Squad hasn’t brought up the U.S. border yet... amazing!
It’s Friday. They’re drunk on vodka. Hopefully they’re having a nice night and I mean that sincerely!
“Russia’s been issuing thinly-veiled threats against Poland and the Baltic states for many months now.”
Sweden and Finland have been taking notes...
“Putin’s invasion has more than doubled its border with NATO countries to about 1600 miles.
Did that open up any other points of favorable border terrain? “
No.
That’s the amazing part.
The border with Norway is extremely remote Arctic with very few roads.
the border with Finland excluding the Vyborg peninsula is heavily forested with very few roads (that’s why the Ussr had such trouble in the Winter War). The Vyborg peninsula north of St Petersburg has large numbers of lakes, rivers and marches.
The Estonian border has rivers, lakes and marshes with very few roads.
The southern part of the Latvia border is vulnerable and was the invasion route of Army Group North in Barbarossa.
The Belarus border north of the Pripets Marshes is vulnerable and was the route for Army Group Center in Barbarossa.
The most vulnerable border, and by far the longest stretch is the Ukraine border between the Belarus border/Pripets marshes and Karkhiv. That was the Route for Barbarossa Army Group South.
Also, the 1991 border South of Kharkiv is very vulnerable to a march on Moscow.
For anyone who is interested, this is a Canadian Reserve Staff officer going thru a terrain analysis of the Ukraine Russia border.
(relevant section starts at the prompt)
https://youtu.be/00RGPa9CQgw?t=915
Finland will be happy to learn that.
Finland lost territory after the Winter War to give the USSR more defensible borders.
Yet they areso afraid of Russian invasion that they requested to join NATO’s defensive alliance for protection from Russia.
Pyrrhic victory for the Soviets. Just like the Russo-Ukrainian War. The Russians may end up getting four oblasts from Ukraine. But at the cost of hundreds of thousands dead Russian soldiers.
Terrain can help on defence. But you still need a functional military.
But why build, when the USA (excuse me, “NATO”) provides it for free ?
That was pure nonsense, you drifted off again.
Anything they do will be like a straw house to the Big Bad Wolf.
The “Biden” Administration would welcome Russia invading the Baltics.
All kinds of aid could be siphoned off to the globalist jackals.
“10% to the Big Guy” ™
Nice try, Frick.
Your beloved Russia is full of bluff and bluster; it’s only trump card is its nukes. Which is exactly how Iran would be if it gets nukes. You know, Iran: Your beloved Russia’s new best bud. How sad for you that Russia’s only real allies are third-world, and backward, and schizo pseudo nations, and radical religious misfits.
That would explain you, too, Frick.
Yes, they have.
The French must have considered what eventually happened... didn’t they?
“The French must have considered what eventually happened... didn’t they?”
Some did.
“FAIL”
The war needs to end (to save lives) and the font of corruption needs to stop out of Ukraine (to save Taxpayers).
Russia never wanted all of Ukraine. Unless Zelensky is dead or in exile, i cant give a crap about either side, other than be on the side of fewer lives lost (ON BOTH SIDES).
Nato is the biggest fail out of this conflict, as well as the Eurozone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.