Posted on 01/19/2024 10:21:55 AM PST by SeekAndFind
UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak survived a key test of his leadership Wednesday, fending off right-wing rebels to win a crunch parliamentary vote on his contentious plan to send migrants to Rwanda.
Sunak, in power since October 2022, has staked his political future on the scheme, as Britain gears up for its next general election later this year.
Right-wing Conservatives had threatened to kill the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill, but they ultimately backed down and the government won comfortably by 320 votes to 276.
The result means Sunak avoids a serious weakening of his authority, as his faction-ridden party desperately needs to claw back support from the main opposition Labour party before the nationwide vote.
The bill is the British leader's answer to a UK Supreme Court ruling late last year that deporting asylum seekers to Kigali is illegal under international law.
The latest legislation, if passed, would compel judges to treat Rwanda as a safe third country.
It would also give UK ministers powers to disregard sections of international and British human rights legislation.
While the bill cleared its third and final hurdle in the elected House of Commons, it will need to be approved by the unelected upper chamber House of Lords before it becomes law.
The government does not hold a majority in the Lords, where members are likely to scrutinise the proposals and offer a number of amendments, setting up another battle with Downing Street.
The legislation could also still be blocked by legal challenges, drawing out the long-running saga -- dubbed a "farce" and a "gimmick" by Labour -- even further.
Chris Hopkins, political research director at polling firm Savanta, said "the public perception of the government's incompetence around immigration still remains deep-rooted and may only move when planes to Rwanda actually take off".
"Even then, it's going to take a lot more for the Conservative Party to claw back its credibility on this issue," he told AFP.
"As of now, all they have managed to achieve is highlighting their own internal divisions to an unimpressed electorate."
London has already paid Kigali GBP240 million (280 million euros) since ex-prime minister Boris Johnson first announced the plan in April 2022.
Sunak has pledged to slash record levels of regular migration and stop asylum seekers crossing from France to Britain in small boats.
He insists the Rwanda bill is essential to deter migrants from considering travelling to the United Kingdom via unauthorised routes.
But the proposal has reopened splits between right-wingers and moderates in the ruling party not seen since the wranglings over what Brexit should look like following the 2016 EU referendum.
Several dozen Tory lawmakers backed unsuccessful amendments that sought to toughen the scheme, including by disapplying international law and restricting migrants' right to appeal deportation.
Two deputy chairmen resigned their roles in support of the tweaks, which received the vocal support of Johnson, who is no longer an MP and not able to vote.
Sunak refused to bow to rebel demands though because doing so would almost certainly have seen the bill scuppered by moderates, who say the legislation already pushes at the margins of acceptability.
In a bid to quell the dissent, Sunak's government announced that it would hire new judges to create thousands of additional sittings to fast-track cases to the courts.
His "illegal migration minister" also appeared to suggest that ministers would have the power to force civil servants to ignore last-minute injunctions from the European Court of Human Rights.
Sunak also faced down rebels during the first vote on the bill in December.
Around 30,000 asylum seekers crossed the English Channel on rudimentary vessels last year. Five died trying to make the journey this past weekend.
Hundreds were picked up from the freezing waters and brought ashore on Wednesday, an AFP photographer in the south coast port of Dover saw.
The Camp of the Saints plays out all across Europe.
And the phrase “UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak” would have been not just unthinkable but absurd in 1960.
Do the British people think Labor would be better on illegal immigration?
Sink the boats.
There’s probably more at play. Remember the British are starting to rebel against the WEF and it’s members.
“I find it hard to believe that “right-wing conservative” Brits would oppose a PM (even one of India origin) trying to prevent the invasion of Britain by illegal immigrants by sending them back to Africa.”
I saw other articles saying that the bill didn’t go far enough for them, although I don’t the details. It’s possible that Sunak’s bill is more show than substance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.