You forgot the best part.
“…. that involves the issue of whether that person lacks unique relevant personal knowledge.”
I would think one party to a tryst has unique relevant personal knowledge about the tryst.
EC
Also, remember the first case that involved “alienation of affection” that actually resulted in a million dollar-esque verdict for the plaintiff?
To me, whether a divorce proceeding was in the works before Fani’s fanny tryst started or not isn’t the question. It’s the fact she actually PAID Wade for the ‘privilege’ that substantively kept Wade from any chance of reconciliation or remediation.