To: guitar Josh
don’t 4 justices have to agree to hear the case for the Supreme Court to hear the case…That is one of the main points of this article, one which the headline writer completely missed.
8 posted on
01/13/2024 3:06:14 PM PST by
GSWarrior
To: GSWarrior
“That is one of the main points of this article, one which the headline writer completely missed.”
Oh yes. I guess I should have mentioned, if all those justices recused themselves then they wouldn’t have quorum and couldn’t hear the case.
But the left will get wiser and soon figure out a way to use this method in a winning manner.
10 posted on
01/13/2024 3:11:20 PM PST by
CFW
(I will not comply!)
To: GSWarrior
Also named as defendants are five of the Justices -- Thomas, Kavanaugh, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett -- all of whom recused themselves, as well as Chief Justice Roberts. This means that the remaining three justices are not enough for a quorum to take place. This also means that the case reverts to the 5th District court decision, which was a resounding rebuke.
13 posted on
01/13/2024 3:16:56 PM PST by
DoodleBob
(Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson