So, is this a new technique of the left? To included the Justices as Defendants on any cases filed? It seems they would be dismissed as Defendants at the get-go.
1 posted on
01/13/2024 2:45:35 PM PST by
CFW
To: CFW
Abortion isnβt in the constitution good luck with that
2 posted on
01/13/2024 2:47:48 PM PST by
NWFree
(Sigma male π€ͺ)
To: CFW
Aside from the obvious points in the article, why would a New Jersey resident have standing in a case against Texas?
3 posted on
01/13/2024 2:52:11 PM PST by
liberalh8ter
( Ephesians 6:10 - 18)
To: CFW
SCOTUS says itβs a state issue
He/she is from Jersey. He/she is suing Texas.
Standing??
4 posted on
01/13/2024 2:52:39 PM PST by
qaz123
To: CFW
I didn’t click the link, but don’t 4 justices have to agree to hear the case for the Supreme Court to hear the case?
To: CFW
Ok, note to self, name all lib Supreme Court justices in suit πππππππ
7 posted on
01/13/2024 3:01:26 PM PST by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Stingβ¦)
To: CFW
This will continue until Conservatives fight back...How??
Victims of crime from those let loose from criminal behavior time and time again need to start dropping lawsuits against the judges, DA’s and politicians who enabled the criminals to get back on the street.
9 posted on
01/13/2024 3:07:32 PM PST by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: CFW
Fortunately the rules of the Supreme Court do not allow the remaining three justices to render an opinion in the case.
To: CFW
which justice accepted the case?
16 posted on
01/13/2024 4:44:44 PM PST by
joshua c
To: CFW
17 posted on
01/13/2024 5:19:55 PM PST by
sauropod
(The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson