“They are also ‘insurrectionists.’”
I read the article at the link, but there is no mention of “insurrectionists,” or anything even remotely associated with such a label. Is there another article to which you are referring?
“As I said ‘here comes the neocon ass-covering....’”
I have no idea to what you are referring, unless you are labeling the Polish courts “neo-cons,” as the action described in the article was, in fact, the result of the Polish legal process.
However, I am not very familiar with Poland’s legal system and its application. I am copying FReeper cronos on this as he may be in a position to explain it to us.
Weird how if they are “just implementing a decision of the Supreme Court” it occurs months/years after-the-fact when the new EU/globalist Tusk takes over
hmmmmm
Unfortunately I’m not able to explain it - the intricacies of the legal system on this confuses me as well.
As far as I understand - they were convicted, but then got a Presidential pardon. Leaving aside whether the President (Duda) was right to do so or not), the fact is that he DID pardon them and the President is the highest court of appeal.
The Supreme court cannot - as far as I understand the details of the Polish constitution - overturn a Presidential pardon. To do so is to basically overturn the constitution.
One MAY say (as in many US Presidential pardons), that one disagrees with WHY the incumbent President did that, but it is the President’s prerogative.