Over your approach, I’ll take Judge Robert Bork. the leading constitutional scholar of his time, and his definition of sound constitutional application: apply the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended. I think the Court would (or should) as well.
Your opinion is subjective and not based on the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended but on “old fashioned common sense.”
NBC is a legal matter and since Court precedent on this issue is based on sound constitutional application (rare in the 20th century), precedent should win the day in Court over your subjective opinion. See you then.
You keep mentioning Bork, but you won’t provide me with what you are referring to. Without that I am left with your insistence that he stands with the interpretation.