Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NetAddicted

—DeWine claimed that, were he to support the bill, “Ohio would be saying that the state, that the government, knows better what is best for a child than the two people who know that child the best—the parents.”

By that reasoning, the state would have to stand idly by if parents were to blind a child or sever its limbs, if they declared that that was in its best interest. I’m not sure what ideological framework he is working in.


24 posted on 01/01/2024 9:24:15 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rightwingcrazy

The guy would have more credibility if he wasn’t governor of a state with literally hundreds of pages of statutes and regulations governing the practice of medicine.


27 posted on 01/01/2024 10:10:53 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson