He literally provided SCOTUS decisions that showcase the court's long-standing interpretation (across multiple court cases of a wide variety over an extended period of time going back over a century) of what "natural-born citizens" are and aren't.
Besides, if you're asking for a specific statutory definition of "natural-born citizen", that's not the job of the judiciary to do. Such an act is explicitly within the purview of the legislative branch, i.e. the American Congress.
you misread and missed my first response to him.
Show me the definition of NBC in the cases. Allegiance to the country is not the same as NBC. Ark was determined to be a natural citizen by virtue of his parents living here. Not a NBC.
I stand by Vattel who was known to the founders and the letter from Jay and washington which I posted a link to.
If a person has a choice of citizenship they are not natural born US because they have a choice. Show me where that is wrong or do you disagree with Wash and Jay who didn’t want a foreigner as commander in chief.
That is my informed decision and that is why I call for a USSC ruling. It is their responsibility to interpret the constiitution