Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woodpusher
Yeah, I reject your claims. You do not publish a book claiming it is based on the work of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania without it being true.

And of course the book got a second edition in the 1840s if I recall correctly.

None of those brilliant legal minds in Pennsylvania thought to call it out?

You're just wrong my dude.

175 posted on 12/27/2023 9:40:20 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; Widget Jr; Penelope Dreadful; Ultra Sonic 007; Fury
Yeah, I reject your claims. You do not publish a book claiming it is based on the work of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania without it being true.

Reject all you want. Produce a book by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Oh, you can't. Drat.

The court produced a list of British statute titles.

Your author was Samuel Roberts, a solitary judge from the Court of Common Pleas.

You attempted to pass off the work of the common pleas court judge as the work of Justices Tilghman, Yeates, Smith and Brackenridge of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Multiple people caught your deliberate deception.

As previously noted, it is, indeed, thrilling that someone with the Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania expressed an opinion you so cherish that you attributed it to four other people you say were at the Constitutional Convention. The author of your book was born in 1763 and died in 1820. The youngest delegate to the Constitutional Convention was Jonathan Dayton, age 26. Your author would have been, at best, 24.

184 posted on 12/28/2023 12:31:01 AM PST by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson