Yeah, I reject your claims. You do not publish a book claiming it is based on the work of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania without it being true.
Reject all you want. Produce a book by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Oh, you can't. Drat.
The court produced a list of British statute titles.
Your author was Samuel Roberts, a solitary judge from the Court of Common Pleas.
You attempted to pass off the work of the common pleas court judge as the work of Justices Tilghman, Yeates, Smith and Brackenridge of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Multiple people caught your deliberate deception.
As previously noted, it is, indeed, thrilling that someone with the Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania expressed an opinion you so cherish that you attributed it to four other people you say were at the Constitutional Convention. The author of your book was born in 1763 and died in 1820. The youngest delegate to the Constitutional Convention was Jonathan Dayton, age 26. Your author would have been, at best, 24.
Multiple people decided to assert I am incorrect, but that doesn't make me wrong.
I am very much accustomed to being the only correct person in the room. I've dealt with this burden many times during my life. :)
What does the book say?
You just don't like it because it blows a big hole in what you wish to believe.