Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HUGE: New Supreme Court Filing Seeks To Strip Jack Smith Of Authority
Trending Politics ^ | December 21, 2023: Updated:December 21, 2023 | Matthew Holloway

Posted on 12/21/2023 3:51:19 PM PST by henbane

As Smith was hired directly by current AG Merrick Garland, the correct constitutional process of appointment by the President, and confirmation by the full U.S. Senate never took place.

. . . the various legal actions undertaken by Smith under color of law “can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices. Neither Smith nor the position of Special Counsel under which he purportedly acts meets those criteria.

But perhaps the most damning and dismissive statement of Smith’s unconstitutional appointment comes from the text of the brief itself stating that “Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor. Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos.”

(Excerpt) Read more at trendingpoliticsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abuseofprocess; illegal; jacksmith; lawfare; scotus; specialcounsel; trump; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: henbane

Finally, a well written brief that may (however remotely) be helpful to Trump. Of course the brief wasn’t drafted or submitted by Trump’s attorneys .


21 posted on 12/21/2023 4:42:34 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HalfIrish
The special prosecutor act expired and so there is no legal authority.

But this is a terribly written article, because it does not explain why Meese et al have standing to file a writ petition. Who are they representing who has a case that can be appealed?

22 posted on 12/21/2023 4:44:41 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: henbane

Another move on article.


23 posted on 12/21/2023 4:49:34 PM PST by devane617 (Discipline Is Reliable, Motivation Is Fleeting..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane

If this is successful the REEEEEing from our Left will be a beautiful thing to watch.


24 posted on 12/21/2023 4:51:46 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

It was just decided that the SCOTUS will not agree with Jack Smith to bump another case so that his would be expedited. Both Smith and partisan Judge Chutkan want the trial in early March but that seems less likely now.

Just posted two hours ago on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz73GNq0JxY


25 posted on 12/21/2023 4:53:17 PM PST by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: henbane

What a great Christmas gift that would be!!!


26 posted on 12/21/2023 5:03:38 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Dems: We cheated fair and square!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane

Here is a second source.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/12/20/jack-smiths-special-counsel-appointment-is-unconstitutional-former-attorney-general-tells-supreme-court/


27 posted on 12/21/2023 5:07:52 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EliRoom8

thanx for the post.


28 posted on 12/21/2023 5:08:14 PM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Vet, John Adams Descendant , deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: henbane

Can you believe all the constitutional FRawyers here!


29 posted on 12/21/2023 5:10:15 PM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane
Reminds me of...



Dickless.
30 posted on 12/21/2023 5:21:48 PM PST by know.your.why (<>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane

Those filing the case with SCOTUS are certainly bright and knowledgeable of the law, and I would trust what they say to be so.

My only question is, why has it taken this long????


31 posted on 12/21/2023 5:23:17 PM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Good connection.

Here is another commentary on this special legal issue.

Standing issues never go away but may be raised at any point in any litigation.

The fact of the matter is that everything Jack Smith has done as Special Counsel, since his appointment on November 18, 2022 has been unconstitutional and is null and void.

Anyone now in jail, or subject to a plea bargain, with Jack Smith can ask to be released because Jack Smith is, in truth, a private citizen.

The judge in the Florida District Court classified documents case is under the jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit and is not bound by D.C. Circuit precedent.

Any litigant in a case before her can argue that Jack Smith is not a lawfully appointed officer of the United States.

Jack Smith Lacks Standing to File in the Supreme Court Because He is Only a Private Citizen

32 posted on 12/21/2023 5:31:15 PM PST by henbane ( WAKE UP, AMERICA! The Dems & RINOs are eating you alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Those filing the case with SCOTUS are certainly bright and knowledgeable of the law, and I would trust what they say to be so.

My only question is, why has it taken this long????

The issue itself is a fiery, political hot potato and fraught with many dangers for any legal-eagle who grabs ahold.

United States Constitutional law itself is the issue here. For better or worse, the names of the legal players in this struggle will end up in the History books.

Many prefer to avoid the battlefield.

33 posted on 12/21/2023 5:50:44 PM PST by henbane ( WAKE UP, AMERICA! The Dems & RINOs are eating you alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: henbane

“..For better or worse...”

This entire time beginning before Trump announced will require an entire chapter in the history book. The extremes the established power brokers of the nation, of the world, have taken to eliminate this man have never been seen before and, hopefully, will never be seen again. But he, and we, must overcome all the barricades and obstacles placed so the MAGA movement can turn the mighty ship of state back to the right direction. There are many who have already paid a dear price for their support, Giuliani being the latest. And undoubtedly there will be more.


34 posted on 12/21/2023 6:12:26 PM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
Can you believe all the constitutional FRawyers here!

I wouldn't worry about it. My observation is that real lawyers don't know the law either.

The Colorado Supreme court just proved that you can be a complete idiot or a liar and still be a judge in the highest court in a state.

The "law" is a great big kabuki dance between those who have power, and those who want something.

35 posted on 12/21/2023 6:31:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Where did you get your law degree?


36 posted on 12/21/2023 6:51:28 PM PST by roving (Deplorable Listless Vessel Trumpist With Trumpitis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

We have pretend lawyers, pretend doctors, and pretend generals.


37 posted on 12/21/2023 6:53:08 PM PST by roving (Deplorable Listless Vessel Trumpist With Trumpitis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: roving

Same place as Jack Smith


38 posted on 12/21/2023 6:55:02 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

This is nonsense.

The AG can hire a lawyer and have him work under the auspices of the DOJ without POTUS appointment or Congressional approval.

He’s simply a prosecutor.
————————————————-

Not that simple. Assistant U.S. Attorneys are authorized by Congress. There are also Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys that work at the direction and under the control oh U.S. Attorneys. Smith was named an Independent Counsel without being appointed y the President and with no authorization from Congress. This is a legitimate issue. Read the amicus brief.


39 posted on 12/21/2023 7:29:58 PM PST by bort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bort

Barr appointed Durham as a special counsel.


40 posted on 12/21/2023 7:33:53 PM PST by Fuzz (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson