Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stars & stripes forever

From a friend from school

Jesus a Jew not Palestinian

I’m seeing a lot of commentary about how “Jesus was Palestinian” - even from friends I would otherwise consider academics. I’m also seeing pics of nativities where baby Jesus is wrapped in a Keffiyeh (I have feelings about that). So, I’m taking the rare step of chiming in because this actually is my wheelhouse (my two degrees being in Religious Studies and Genealogy).

First, let me say the (hopefully) most obvious part out loud: Jesus was a Jew. This is actually not up for debate. The real, historical Jesus (actual name: Yeshua ben Yosef) was a Jew born in the Roman province of Judea (translate: “Land of the Jews”) to a Judean Mizrahi Jewish father (Yosef) and a Galileean Mizrahi Jewish mother (Miriam). We know that he wore the tzitzit and was well-versed in Torah - enough so that his followers called him “Rabbi”. We also have an extensive genealogy that traces his lineage to King David of the Tribe of Judah (we cannot prove this to current genealogical standards, but even without the genealogy we can solidly say Jesus was a Judean Jew).

I get it. Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus, lies in what is NOW the Palestinian West Bank. That does not make him magically, retroactively, a Palestinian. Actually, the words “Palestine” and “Palestinian” would have been meaningless to Jesus and his contemporaries, as the moniker “Syria-Palestina” was not placed on the region until approximately 100 years after Jesus’ death - and it was only done by the Roman Empire as an insult to the Jews and in an attempt to alienate them from their homeland. Furthermore, the term “Palestinian” used to refer to a cohesive ethnic identity didn’t occur until the 1960’s. Just to be clear, that’s about 1,930 years after Jesus’ death.

Let me put it this way: saying “Jesus was Palestinian” is like saying “Pocahontas was a citizen of the United States of America”. It’s not only historically inaccurate, it’s also pretty offensive.

Now, bear with me because I’m about to get even more genealogical on you. The people we currently call “Palestinians” trace their heritage back to the Bronze Age Canaanites. By the Iron Age, the region was split into the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judea (both ethnically-religiously Jewish). In the 7th century BCE, the Assyrian army captured a portion of the Kingdom of Israel, known as Samaria. This is where we start to see a clear ethnic schism. The population of Samaria mixed heavily with the Assyrian conquerors and became distinct (genetically and religiously) from their Jewish neighbors. This brings us to the time of Jesus. While Jesus was very clearly NOT a Samaritan, having no Samaritan relatives and not being born nor raised in Samaria, modern day Palestinians, you might have guessed, can trace much of their heritage to the Samaritans. But it goes even further than that. About 600 years after the death of Jesus came the Muslim conquests of Israel. At this time, a great deal of Arab and Persian influence (cultural, linguistic, and genetic) entered the region while the Jews were pushed out (violently, if they did not flee of their own accord). In much needed summary, the Palestinians are descended from the indigenous Samaritan population mixed with the Arab conquerors. Mizrahi Jews remained as an ever-constant presence in Israel and the Levant, albeit under heavy oppression, while the Jews of the exile mixed to an extent with their host countries (giving us the Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews).

So, regardless of where Bethlehem now lies geo-politically, Jesus was not a “Palestinian”. You cannot retroactively change someone’s identity based on ever-flowing political boundaries. Not ethnically, not regionally, not religiously. Having said that, I think most scholars of Jesus would agree that, were he alive in the flesh today, Jesus would be absolutely horrified by the violence being perpetrated on both sides of this disgusting conflict. During his three year ministry, we know that Jesus ministered to his fellow Jews, he ministered to the Samaritans, and he even ministered to the Gentiles. Jesus was about building bridges between people and breaking down societal barriers. He undoubtedly would have recognized that Jews and Palestinians have more in common (and this is true genealogically) than they have differences. They are, in a very real sense of the term, cousins.

To quote the shortest verse in the New Testament:
“Jesus wept.”


1,771 posted on 01/01/2024 3:32:49 PM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is ~~. tell the storm how BIG your GOD is! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1725 | View Replies ]


To: DollyCali
THUMBS-UP
1,781 posted on 01/01/2024 3:53:17 PM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1771 | View Replies ]

To: DollyCali

Thank you for this very concise and clear explanation of why Jesus is not a Palestinian. I am going to save it for reference


1,871 posted on 01/02/2024 4:59:39 AM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1771 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson