Posted on 12/16/2023 3:28:02 AM PST by 11th_VA
On the evening of Dec. 16, 1773, a crowd of armed men, some allegedly wearing costumes meant to disguise them as Native American warriors, boarded three ships docked at Griffin’s Wharf in Boston. In the vessels’ holds were 340 chests containing 92,000 pounds of tea, the most popular drink in America. With support from the patriot group known as the Sons of Liberty, the intruders methodically searched the ships and dumped their tea into Boston Harbor.
According to the British East India Company, whose proprietors owned the destroyed cargo, losses totaled more than a million dollars in today’s currency.
The “destruction of the tea” – as the Boston Tea Party was originally called – was the pivotal event in the coming of the American Revolution. Before Dec. 16, a peaceful resolution to American objections to Parliament’s repeated attempts to tax the Colonies without their consent seemed possible. Afterward, both British and American Colonial positions hardened. Within a year, Britain and America were at war.
An attack on private property
Because it was an attack on private property, the Tea Party offended many patriots in America. When George Washington learned what had happened, he made clear he disapproved of “destroying the tea.”
Benjamin Franklin so disliked the action that he offered to pay for the East India Company’s losses himself. Samuel Adams, assumed by both his peers and modern historians to be one of the Tea Party’s organizers, never admitted to being involved.
The original multinational conglomerate
Given the importance that Americans attached to property rights, why were Boston patriots willing to take such a calculated risk? The answer was the corrupt bargain that Lord North, the British prime minister, struck with the East India Company during the spring of 1773…
(Excerpt) Read more at theconversation.com ...
Happy Boston Tea Party Day
TEA is so white!
What about Colt 45?
The destruction of the tea absolutely enflamed Britain. They were out for blood after that.
1774 was a momentous year. Britain tightened the screws with the coercive acts, but they had the reverse effect. In Massachusetts, by the end of the year the British only controlled Boston, a tiny little peninsula. The rest of the colony basically declared independence from British rule. And in September, the General Court (the legislature) was no more. A provincial Congress was established and was essentially the governing body.
The Tea Party was, as John Adams called it an epocha in history.
If coercion was Britain’s only choice, then the Colonists began to see that perhaps they, too, had just one choice: armed resistance, followed on July 4, 1776, by a declaration of independence.
I think the Proclamation Line of 1763 might have po’d the colonists, too...
Wasn’t just the taxes.
250 Years After The Boston Tea Party, Americans Still Recognize Government Tyranny When They See It
Governments by nature are coercive entities. The larger the government grows the more onerous and coercive it becomes. Just look at the difference in our own central government since WW2, and it gets worse every day.
MALT RULES!
BTTT.
Sad to see that the city that was the birthplace of freedom has become a linchpin in the iron curtain of Communism in 250 years.
Maybe America needs another “Green Dragon Inn”.
And now the sons and daughters of the first patriots in Massachusetts are big government supporters. How far they have fallen.
If people are willing to vote for tyranny, why does Deep State have to steal elections, hmmmm...?
Because to them, still not enough people are willing to vote for tyranny.
If you believe the polls, 37% of the American electorate thinks Joe Biden is doing a grand job. That’s 37% right there that will solidly vote for tyranny.
Then there are people who think Biden et al would do a much better job if the Republicans weren’t so mean and worked with him. They shouldn’t be allowed to vote because they are idiots, but we don’t have a law banning idiots from voting yet. (and if the is one proposed, it will be used against us who vote for non-Democrats)
And then there are people so absolutely clueless that they pull the lever for a Democrat every time no matter what.
Between these three groups described, Leftists are approaching the 50% popular vote goal.
Their problem is, the way things are constituted with the Electoral College, even 55% STILL isn’t enough to guarantee them victory. So they have to steal elections in “battleground states”.
If you did that today, you might need an Environmental Impact Study to see if any fishes would get harmed in the protest of dumping the tea. 🤓
Bear in mind the Freemasons of Boston had special meetings every night for a week, except on Tea Party day.
You don't need a membership at either of them to be able to download Ebooks or the Audiobooks based on them.
The Audiobook I created took me nearly a year to finish, and is 15 hours long called Life and Times of Joseph Warren. (LINK: Download Audiobook version of "Life and Times of Joseph Warren")
It was written by Richard Frothingham Jr. in 1865. It was my first attempt at a full length audiobook, and like most things, I learned a great deal while doing it that will make my next audiobook better, I don't have it in me to go back and re-do the Frothingham book, but I believe it is worthy of listening to.
I post this here, because what is absolutely fascinating to me is the level of detail Richard Frothingham puts into the book he wrote, often on a day-to-day basis of the activities of the Patriots in Massachusetts in their attempts to obtain what they viewed as fair treatment by their own government.
Very similar to what many of us feel today. I don't know about all of you, but I absolutely feel the anger of "Taxation Without Representation" today, among other things.
This book has one chapter on Joseph Warren's early life and family, but the next 14 chapters begin in 1763, spanning the Stamp Act in 1765 to his death as a Patriot General at the Battle of Bunker Hill. He was a 23 year old practicing physician when the Stamp Act was passed, and he was 33 years old when he died at the redoubt of Bunker Hill, in the thick of battle, when it was overrun because the Patriots had run out of ammunition.
During that time, he rose to be the prominent public voice against the British. While it is true Samuel Adams was the prominent behind the scenes voice in the Patriot Cause, he was seen and heard less often in the public eye than was Warren, and Warren was the one who generally interacted directly with the British Authorities. He was considered to be one of the greatest Patriot orators of his day, certainly one of the most learned. He was professional, diplomatic, literate, compassionate, and urbane, all those characteristics in such great measure that it is astonishing for his age of 33 when he died at the peak of his skills at Bunker Hill.
He was there at the beginning, and although considered an intellectual (he WAS) he was as passionate and inflamed on the subject of Liberty as any man, as evidenced by this account by Frothingham in his book:
"...Though of marked amiability of character, he was naturally high-tempered, impulsive,and quick to resent an insult: at times he was passionate. One evening,when the British troops were quartered in the town, he was challenged in a burly way by a sentinel, when Warren knocked him down. He could be vehement in the expressions of feeling. On an occasion when his spirit was stirred by the taunts that British officers were uttering on the Americans, he said to William Eustis, subsequently the Governor of Massachusetts, "These fellows say we won't fight: by heavens, I hope I shall die up to my knees in blood!"..."
And he meant it. At the Boston Massacre, he tended, as a physician, to the wounded, even as their blood still flowed fresh into the cobblestoned street. When war broke out on April 19, 1775, as related by a fellow physician, "...His soul beat to arms," Dr. Eliot says, "as soon as he learned the intention of the British troops..."
He tasked one of his medical students to take care of his patients, jumped on his horse, and left Boston heading for Lexington. An account by Dr. Welch, who rode with him part of the way described it as follows:
"...Two soldiers," Dr. Welch says,"going to Lexington, tried to steal Watson's horse,at Watson's Corner; the old man,with his cat and hat, pulling one way, and the soldiers the other. Dr. Warren rode up, and helped drive them off. Tried to pass Percy's column; stopped by bayonets. Two British officers rode up to Dr. Warren, in the rear of the British, inquiring 'Where are the troops?' The doctor did not know. They were greatly alarmed. Went home..."
On the day he died two months later at Bunker Hill, he had been appointed a General, and was expected to serve a medical role out of the line of fighting, but would have none of it. He did not have the military knowledge to be useful as a General, deferred to the officer in charge, and instructed him to send him where he could be of the most use.
The point of these passages above is to show Warren was a man of action as well as words. This is the man who was instrumental in the events of the Boston Tea Party several years before. He was the official voice in the direct negotiations with the British regarding the vessels and their tea. He was the voice that reached out, via the Committee of Correspondence (which was tasked with communicating not only with all the communities in Massachusetts to align their behavior and actions, but also with all the colonies throughout Colonial America. He was the official head of the Committee of Correspondence.
It was a delicate time. Boston was only the first place tea was going to arrive. No doubt, based on what happened in Boston as a test case for the British, would be done to the rest of the Colonies with ships of tea. Boston was in a precarious situation, because if they buckled, all the rest of the Colonies would fall in, and it was Warren who corresponded with all of them to assure them Boston would hold fast in the face of it, and he admonished them to follow his example in their Colonies.
When the time came, it was never officially disclosed that Warren was one of the "Mohawks", though in a list given in a memoir, there is one Charlestown man who was unidentified, and that is thought by many to be Dr. Warren.
It is my opinion that, if Warren had not died at Bunker Hill, he would have, in post-colonial America, inhabited the same space as Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Franklin.
The book itself, unread by many (including me, until I dictated this) has an astonishing amount of day-to-day detail in the efforts the Patriots made to find a diplomatic resolution to the tea issue, before they resorted to the Tea Party, in which nobody was harmed except the merchants, who were caught between a rock and a hard place.
Frothingham devotes nearly 74 pages in this book to the Boston Tea Party alone, all the correspondences, the interactions with the Massachusetts Governor, the British Military, and the citizens of Colonial America, all of it intended to avoid bloodshed, and nearly all of it orchestrated and communicated by the 33 year old Dr. Joseph Warren.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
