There is room for hope. But the statute is really vague, and ripe for the picking by prosecutors , like the ones who were/are looking to pick on the J6 attendees. This is just the short version:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS22784/6
the real question is... if the election was fraudulent, state courts would not hear any cases (66+ cases dismissed without being heard), the states denied election audits, and the supreme court would not allow one of the two candidates to bring a case... what other options are there to stop the theft of the election?
jan 6th was the day they were certifying the election. congress people were saying how there were significant problems with the elections and they need to be investigated... but nancy disregarded them completely and pushed for the certification to finalize.
jan 6th was the last governmental option to stop the steal. there’s only one step after that.
The Supreme Court is on the verge of making the entire U.S. government irrelevant and illegitimate to at least half the American people.
This is a dangerous time. Whatever the Supreme Court fears from the DC criminals is nothing compared to what rejecting the majority of Americans will bring to their doorstep.
Jan. 6 was engineered by the election thieves as an excuse to compel a rushed certification; they needed to thwart any chance that Congress would be able to hear discussion of irregularities from their members before certifying the electors votes, so they made it “unsafe” to do so.
So if this turns out be a violation of civil rights, will those in jail be entitled to monetary compensation?