Posted on 12/07/2023 6:23:36 AM PST by Red Badger
Of course the Jamaican judge will agree. In fact, she’ll probably say, “Hey, go for it. If you wouldn’t, I was planning on doing it!”
That is clearly a 1st amendment issue and any decent judge would disallow it. Which means judge Chitkan will allow it.
“...“evidence” that he claims will expose Trump’s attempts to foster doubt about the election process.”
If that’s a crime, there are a few hundred thousand people out there that are just as, if not more, guilty than Trump. I for one. Maybe I should turn myself in for having an opinion. I’ve heard of a pack of lions, a gaggle of geese, and a pack of wolves. But I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a landslide of stupid.
wy69
The author of this article is an idiot and to quote POLITICO is one idiot relying upon another. No one anymore knows the difference between the meaning of "sewing" and "sowing" and blaming a computer doesn't get it. And they want to lecture us on Donald Trump. F these idiot morons we are surrounded by everywhere.
No doubt Smith will portray Trump as Orange and Icky, and he therefore must be eradicated from political life, to prevent Trump from destroying the woke Communist takeover of America.
This coming from a third world country is no surprise. I still fear the Demoncrats will assassinate Trump rather the see him as President.
Nothing Trump has done has been against the law. 🙄
jack the serbia/kosovo geneva ripper says what ?
thank God hell is forever.
romans 12:19
Is it illegal to contest an election or the election process?
As rebuttal, Trump should introduce a video as evidence of promised fraud...
Joe Biden: “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
[[will expose Trump’s attempts to foster doubt about the election process]]
So,we’ve gone from the false accusations that he tried to “overturn the election by forced to “fostering doubt”? Since when did it become illegal for so eone to even foster doubt? Their case is,falling apart obviously which is why Smith wants to smear Trump.
>As rebuttal, Trump should introduce a video as evidence of promised fraud...
<
The judge would never allow that................
If that’s a crime, there are a few hundred thousand people out there that are just as, if not more, guilty than Trump. I for one."
Why do we conservatives always go on the defensive? The people most responsible for "fostering doubt about the election process," are those that put cardboard over the windows of the rooms where votes were being counted, pulled suitcases of ballot out from under their desks, reported burst pipes, refused parties standing in cases being filed, etc. If you really want to hold people accountable for fostering doubt about the election, go after those whose actions created the doubt, not the people who merely questioned their actions.
I like it!!!!!!!
Bet the rent on it.......................
That's exactly how I read it.
I’d ask him point blank why he didn’t go after Hillary Clinton who claimed loudly to anyone who would listen that the 2016 election was stolen from her by “Russian Collusion with Trump.”
Why was she never held accountable for questioning the results and trying to overturn a presidential election?
Our country’s legal system is a joke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.