Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Oh? What exactly would he need to violate in the Constitution then?

Not violate, suspend. Temporarily for as long as it takes. For one thing, he would have had to suspend, at the very least, the 1st Amendment protection to the media. From social media all the way up to ABCCBSNBCFUXMSDNCWPETC. Shut them up while he makes his case. That's assuming he has people competent enough to do so. The truth is on our side. Unfortunately, competence and courage are NOT. Repugnic-nts for the most part are stupid cowardly traitors.

67 posted on 12/08/2023 12:57:59 PM PST by Captainpaintball (America needs a Conservative DICTATOR if it hopes to survive. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Captainpaintball
Suspension is violation.

There is no need to suspend any of the Bill of Rights; to deal with the left-wing media takes upholding the Constitution rather, specifically by invoking Article III Section 3, the first two clauses, and let freedom of the press in their case be freedom to self-incriminate since the truth is indeed on our side.
68 posted on 12/08/2023 1:53:20 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson