Posted on 12/01/2023 7:35:27 PM PST by 11th_VA
The justices will now consider the cases at a later date, possibly as soon as next Friday.
.
They’ll see Trump’s name and won’t hear it.
Now, Joe, they live to ride in and save his ass, 24 x 7 / 365.
They may get the 4. The outrages treatment the j6 got is well known l think 4 may have a shred of humanity in them
.
I think they’ve effectively ruled against Trump about 10 times, usually by not taking up his cases and not protecting Executive Privilege.
We are about to find out if the Supreme Court is corrupt.
Capitol rioter Garret Miller says he was following Trump’s orders, apologizes to AOC for threat
cnbc.com ^ | January 25, 2021 | Dan Mangan
Posted on 1/25/2021, 8:30:00 PM by lowbridge
A Texas man charged with invading the Capitol and threatening Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Monday that he was effectively following then-President Donald Trump’s orders when he joined a mob that stormed Congress on Jan. 6.
Garret Miller also apologized to Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., for writing “Assassinate AOC” in a Twitter post. He said he would be willing to testify to Congress or in a trial about the riot....
So did he like ‘hear voices’ ???
We already know that they are mostly constitutionally lawless.
And sadly Trump made it worse.
I don’t have much hope the Court of Supreme Whim will do the right thing. They let us down in Texas vs. Pennsylvania.
Something noteworthy. I was watching the floor live as it went down. Certification was not interrupted, “Challenge” was interrupted. This is why Pelosi arranged it, the election was about to be officially and legally challenged. The shot rang out and the floor was cleared right in the middle of the last representative needed to successfully challenge. That rep was Paul Gosar.
We are finding out the checks and balances in the US are something we can’t depend on anymore.
.
AND 200 FBI assistants who set up the whole thing on behalf of the DOJ & DNC?????
Check it out!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/congressman-says-there-were-at-least-200-undercover-agents-embedded-on-jan-6/ar-AA1kRVlG?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=e6ac60f7764f4cf9bc289fbd465c8c2c&ei=25
with four of the justices female and two of questional gender, we have a supreme court with a severe testosterone deficiency.
Where can we find verification of this?
I’m not questioning your post, I just want to be able to share that evidence.
“We are about to find out if the Supreme Court is corrupt.“
They already ensued to hear an original jurisdiction case. I don’t think they can come back from that.
“We are about to find out if the Supreme Court is corrupt.”
Many of us don’t have to wait. We already know. The leak of the Roe v. Wade decision, for the express purpose of impacting the election, is evidence enough. If not, then how’s Chief Justice Robert’s investigation to find the leaker going?
I think they’ve effectively ruled against Trump about 10 times“
This is true l am hopeful 4 will at least give this a hearing
The Supreme Court already ruled in 2015 a President cannot be held legally liable for anything as President of the United States.
So it will be interesting if they change their minds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.