Wuhan Lab Leak Coverup Unraveling

Hotair ^ | 11/30/2023 | David Strom

[SeekAndFind]

Sky News is doing the work that our own MSM refuses to do.

Ever since it emerged, the origins of COVID should have been one of the top two or three stories in the world. After all, the disease itself was ravaging the world, the responses to the virus were doing even more damage, and the people in charge of responding to the virus were, at the very least, suspects in the case.

Yet even discussion of the possibility of a lab leak was suppressed, and anybody who brought up the possibility was labeled a conspiracy theorist. Social media sites banned people from discussing the matter, and reporters pretended that the issue was settled because Saint Fauci said so.

Those of us who argued–based on voluminous if not conclusive evidence–that the virus likely leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology were labeled cranks. We were scoffed at, ridiculed, and deplatformed. It didn’t matter if you were a Harvard epidemiologist or an average Joe on a barstool; you were persona non grata in polite society.

There are cracks in the stone wall developing. Yesterday I wrote about the British senior minister who dropped the word that the government thought the “novel virus” was likely man-made–he used this as an excuse for the horrible response in Britain–and now Sky News has snagged an interview with Fauci’s boss during the pandemic.

Dr. Kadlec, The former Assist. Sec. for Preparedness and Response at HHS says Dr Fauci, Dr. Collins and himself decided to divert attention away from the lab leak theory because they were afraid of what would be revealed, as well as their guilt and the public response. Listen Carefully… pic.twitter.com/WYhTdBSUhU

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 29, 2023

In the interview, he describes how he, Fauci, and Dr. Collins decided to suppress the lab leak theory because it would reflect badly on the US government. After all, Fauci had poured millions into gain of function research in Wuhan, and it seemed possible to likely that US funds had helped create the virus.

That’s a bad look. For Fauci, Collins, and the US government as a whole. Best to suppress the idea.

A whistleblower has come forward to claim CIA analysts who favoured the COVID-19 lab leak theory were bribed to change their position.https://t.co/A7QND5tSAZ

— Sky News Australia (@SkyNewsAust) November 28, 2023

As I and others reported earlier, Fauci paid off scientists outside the NIH to debunk the lab leak theory and the CIA bribed their own analysts with large bonuses for downplaying the possibility of a lab leak. None of this is new information; what is new is that one of the people who was involved in the decision making is admitting it now that the pandemic is largely in the rear-view mirror.

Even the fact that government officials lied and admitted it is not new; Deborah Birx wrote a book about her experiences during the height of COVID and was very proud that she and others lied to Trump about how long they intended to shut down the country. The whole “14 Days to Stop the Spread” was never their goal–they just needed Trump to buy the first tranche so that he would be prepared to buy the second.

In for a penny, in for a pound.

Still, the American media has been resolute in suppressing the story. They bought into it early on–probably knowing that it was sketchy–and they would rather it go away until they can write tell-all books a few years from now.

The “now it can be told” genre sells, after all. But until we are firmly in a post-Trump era, it is unlikely that anybody here, outside the alternative media, will touch this. I hope I am wrong–after all, the scandal would make for juicy copy.

But for now, it will only be alternative media that keep plugging away.

[yldstrk]

There is absolutely NO evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was the result of a lab leak.

Charlatans keep pushing the lab leak story as a way to insinuate that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was created. Humans have not reached the technological advancement necessary to actually create a virus, but nevermind that. Something does not have to be physically possible to become a conspiracy theory.

All of the evidence points to an animal to human transmission occurring at the Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market. All of the evidence also points to the virus originating in bats.

Pathogens have crossed into humans from animal sources since humans have existed. Why do some people want to believe that this didn’t happen, when history shows us that it happens over and over?
*******
Spare me this line of bs.

[sauropod]

.

[eyeamok]

We used to call actions like this DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE, and if it led to injury or death, YOU WERE THROWN IN PRISON

[T.B. Yoits]

It appears your boss’s contract with the Feds to post propaganda has funding for overtime before the end of year.

[bitt]

p

[null and void]

EVERYTHING biden does either:

a) Weakens America/Americans
b) Distances America's allies
c) Strengthens America's enemies
d) Attacks Christianity
e) Serves islam
f) Harms Israel
Or some combination of the above.
AND
g) Makes him & his family richer

You heard it here first, folks (3 years ago!)

The government wants to disarm us after 247 yrs 'cuz they plan to do are doing things we would shoot them for!

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory AND/OR Spoiler Alert Ping

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory AND/OR Spoiler Alert Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

"Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand." ~ Putt's Law

[ducttape45]

I have to agree. It was all a coordinated effort.

[null and void]

To think they haven’t already pulled the trigger on some of these projects is even stupider.

You're not trying to ruin exDemMom's perfectly good 'I didn't eat the cookies' story with facts are you?

[Pan_Yan]

NIH funneling our money to a Chinese military biolab through CAI front Eco Health Alliance resulted in the multi-year lock down of our biggest manufacturing rival and the reshoring of billions in supply chain infrastructure.

It may be the most successful political / intelligence coup of all time, and I'm confident it was unintentional and the result of massive incompetence by all parties.

[null and void]

};^P>

[reasonisfaith]

“I’d like to see Fauci tied up and injected with marburg virus and a few others, then placed into a net cage filled with sandflies, like he did those poor beagle pups. Then take his miserable corpse out and burn it.”

Fascinating. Your suggestion will be taken into consideration for ongoing review.

[absalom01]

There is absolutely NO evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was the result of a lab leak. Charlatans keep pushing the lab leak story as a way to insinuate that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was created. Humans have not reached the technological advancement necessary to actually create a virus, but nevermind that.

You're conflating two different claims. Going back three years now, the legacy media, the public health establishments both nationally and globally, and virtually everyone in government have been straw manning the lab leak hypothesis by conflating it with claims about "bio-engineering", by which they imply some use of CRISPR to edit specific base pair sequences.

These are two different claims, and the notion that the original virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology is far more robust than the claim that CRISPR must have been used to edit, say, the famous furin cleavage site.

The evidence for the more robust claims behind the lab leak hypothesis won't be found in the viral genome, and the skills of a microbiologist aren't the most relevant. Approach this like a crime scene, and look at the actions, statements, and behaviors of the suspects, and it's hard to escape the conclusion that the proximal origin was the Wuhan Institute of Virology. At minimum, the WIV is a far more likely source than the famous Wuhan wet market that the CCP was telling the world to look at in the winter of 2019 and 2020.

[Taxman]

Great post!

And, WAAAAAY TOO ACCURATE!

[EinNYC]

Fascinating. Your suggestion will be taken into consideration for ongoing review.

Fauci is a mass murderer, for his own profit. What else to do with him?

[little jeremiah]

Pedo and his gang aren’t doing these things because they’re stupid (although they are stupid). They’re mission oriented. Mission: Destroy the USA.

[little jeremiah]

PS - it wasn’t actually a leak. That’s the fall back lie. It was created intentionally, work done in Wuhan by Fauci and others, and simultanesly in DoD funded (and other entities connected with Hunter Bitem and Peter Daszk) illegal biolabs. They wanted covid to be worse but failed, so the back toxic vax plan was the back up.

[grey_whiskers]

Good catch sir.

[grey_whiskers]

You’re a pathological liar.

Sod Off, Swampy.

[grey_whiskers]

Concur.

Well done!

[ransomnote]

You provide some of the lamest distortions to deny the obvious.

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Wuhan Lab Leak Coverup Unraveling, exDemMom wrote:

There is absolutely NO evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was the result of a lab leak.

Charlatans keep pushing the lab leak story as a way to insinuate that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was created. Humans have not reached the technological advancement necessary to actually create a virus, but nevermind that. Something does not have to be physically possible to become a conspiracy theory.

All of the evidence points to an animal to human transmission occurring at the Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market. All of the evidence also points to the virus originating in bats.

Pathogens have crossed into humans from animal sources since humans have existed. Why do some people want to believe that this didn’t happen, when history shows us that it happens over and over?

Scientists modify existing viruses and then patent them.

June 14, 2021

Why Scientists Tweak Lab Viruses to Make Them More Contagious

By Emily Willingham

Scientific American

 

Jun 14, 2021 — The riskier version of gain-of-function research creates viruses with abilities they do not have in nature. 

You cannot patent a natural, unmodified organism. You've had time to learn this.

The first artificial genetically modified viruses could appear in nature in the mid-1950s. The technique of nucleic acid hybridization was developed by the end-1960s. In the late 1970s, a method called the "reverse genetics" emerged to synthesize ribonucleic acid and deoxyribonucleic acid molecules.Mar 24, 2023https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37025520/

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be defined as organisms (i.e. plants, animals or microorganisms) in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination.May 1, 2014

https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-genetically-modified

 

ConservativeMind said it well, especially the part that read, "Where are you getting your science from??" I think your epic sciencetific ignorance is another sign you're just a low powered bot.

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Wuhan Lab Leak Coverup Unraveling, ConservativeMind wrote:

No one is saying a virus was made from scratch. It is very possible to modify a virus, though, and gain-of-function exactly does that.

Where are you getting your science from? This is common knowledge I am providing you.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research

https://phys.org/news/2021-06-gain-of-function-sars-cov-.html