[grey_whiskers]

Not a bit.

Try reading an actual scientific paper, it is very dry and dawdusty: and the terms “influencer” and “misinformation” are not used.
Your writers are performing psy-ops and calling it science.

[DugwayDuke]

grey_whiskers wrote: “Try reading an actual scientific paper, it is very dry and dawdusty: and the terms “influencer” and “misinformation” are not used. Your writers are performing psy-ops and calling it science.”

That doesn’t change the facts. The articles you’re defending aren’t even close to being scientific.