I’ve read your link.
Smears, sloppy writing, character assassination, and innuendo, while talking as though it is, SCIENCE!™
Your authoritative source says it monitors high school and college athletes: and from that, states authoritatively that there is no rise in deaths — even among groups it has not studied.
Which by definition is not, and cannot be SCIENTIFIC!™ despite their wanking off over wearing white lab coats. And one of the authors’being associated with the Seattle Seahawks lends an emotional air of authority without actually doing anything.
Nice try, but your attempt findrae yourself up to someone else’s full height and shooting “SCIENCE!™” only reveals the desperation of those paying you.
(The truth is all of these lists are applied sociology: the supposed trump card that one of the athletes on the list initially blamed the clot shots, but then recanted, could just as easily be the result of management putting pressure on him to recant, as his renouncing a supposedly hysterical claim: such hysteria being implied without being stated.)
rey_whiskers wrote: “Nice try, but your attempt findrae yourself up to someone else’s full height and shooting “SCIENCE!™” only reveals the desperation of those paying you.”
When you make claims such as “Smears, sloppy writing, character assassination, and innuendo, while talking as though it is, SCIENCE!™” instead of refuting with facts, you’re the desperate one.