“ it is not a legitimate federal act or power. None of those things I listed are authorized by the Constitution.”
People here are not going to look up any of these instances and compare them with their constitutional standings. They are going to walk away assuming you are correct
I am not easily swayed
I am going to say you are wrong and it is up to you to prove to me that you are correct
Telling me to do research is not proof
Instead of my doing your work of providing information that YOU are asserting I am going to repay you are wrong. Trump has not acted against the constitution
I will further suggest to others to go to either rattletrap1776 or Derek Johnson (tge Derek Johnson with the most followers- there are copiers) for an explanation with much military, legal and journalistic documentation Al and personal support on how Trump is specifically following the Constitution at all times
Those Derek j sites on x and rumble
You are the the one challenging me, saying I could not produce ONE example of what I said. I provided you with several examples just for sampling. So far, I don’t think you know what you are talking about.
YOU need to offer a reasonable and supportable argument where those things are authorised by the Constitution.
It is up to YOU to show that YOU know and understand the presumptions, text, and structure of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.