Trump's Attorney Has Perfect Response When Judge Says 'Control Your Client'

westernjournal ^ | 11/7/2023 | jack davis

[Elsie]

Must be a wallaby court then.

[Elsie]

Simply because you don’t believe in hell does not mean that hell does not exist.

Check my tagline...

[Elsie]

fa fo

[Elsie]

...we’ve got bigger fish to fry.

Oh?

What part of LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is more important?

[Albion Wilde]

Go ahead, lie to yourself; stew in denial and hatred. What do I care?

[del griffith]

Rolf Harris court.

[del griffith]

Are things great or perfect. Nope. And remember, the fed is putting a drag on things. And yet, the economy remains resilient. I’m paying for gas what I was before the pandemic and prices tanked.

I don’t stew or hate. But I’m sure your opinions are baked in.

[Albion Wilde]

Think what you want. It’s a free country — oh, wait.

[lepton]

I still find it hard to believe the Judge hasn’t been removed and the angry black female sanctioned for contempt.

---

By whom? The judge is responsible for and has complete control of his courtroom.

[del griffith]

We are free. Thankfully.

[Political Junkie Too]

Here is an interesting fifth amendment question for the group:

There are several parts of the fifth amendment that have been incorporated into the states. One of those that has been incorporated is the takings clause.

Can an argument be made that if this lone judge decides to confiscate the entire Trump organization in New York as the penalty for this supposedly repeated claims of fraud, that it amounts to an illegal takings under the fifth amendment?

Can one hostile judge decide that President Trump is guilty even before the trial occurred, and then decide to take the entire Trump Organization from him unilaterally and not have that be an illegal taking without due compensation?

-PJ