That’s not a contract. And includes the ability to quit. And take time off.
You’re still out in make believe land.
A binding agreement between two parties that’s enforceable by law is in fact a contract; thus, the often reported phrase “contract negotiations” concerning employment compensation and benefits.
My point regarding GAF concerns the pharmacist’s career decisions. The employment agreement, however, is a different matter given the performance expectations of the employed. Opposed to the career path, I’m clearly interested in the topic of pharmacists penalizing the consumers who’ve paid for their scripts months if not years in advance. Nonetheless, I do not care whether the pharmacist works or quits. And upon a strike, the participating pharmacists should be fired.
BTW, I have not condemned a single pharmacist and neither have I stated that any one is a slacker. And no doubt not every pharmacist embraces the strike agenda.