Posted on 10/30/2023 2:00:20 PM PDT by george76
Around the world, there has been a deafening silence over excess deaths from governments and the mainstream media, who not so long ago were quite fixated on the daily death toll for Covid. .
On October 20th, a 30-minute adjourned debate (20 rejections later) on excess deaths in the UK House of Commons was finally secured by Andrew Bridgen, MP for North West Leicestershire and member of the Reclaim Party.
Bridgen began his speech to the sound of erupting cheers from the full, upper public gallery, in stark contrast to the almost empty chamber below.
Where were the hundreds of MPs who would normally sit shoulder to shoulder in the chamber? It appears, an increase in deaths of their constituents was not a pressing issue for them on that Friday afternoon.
We’ve experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than in the whole of 2020, unlike the pandemic, however, these deaths are not disproportionately of the old, in other words, the excess deaths are striking down people in the prime of life but no-one seems to care. I fear history will not judge this house kindly.
Strikingly, excess deaths have been seen across all age groups
...
According to the British Medical Journal, ‘Excess deaths are calculated as the difference between current numbers of deaths and those in a baseline year, and the excess can differ depending on the baseline and methodology used.’
This important point on how excess can differ depending on the baseline used, was raised by Bridgen.
ONS Manipulating the Data, Again.
Bridgen explained:
‘To understand if there is an ‘excess’ by definition, you need to estimate how many deaths would have been expected. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) used 2015-2019 as a baseline…Unforgivably, the UK ONS (Office for National Statistics) have included deaths in 2021, as part of their baseline calculation for expected deaths- as if there was anything normal about the deaths in 2021- by exaggerating the number of deaths expected, the number of excess deaths can be minimized.
Why would the ONS want do that?’
My early 2022 interview with Norman Fenton, professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary, University of London, revealed how the ONS had also been manipulating the data on deaths involving Covid-19 by vaccination status.
Fenton coauthored a paper analysing the ONS report: ‘Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 2 January and 24 September 2021.’
The paper concluded that the ONS was guilty of ‘systematic miscategorisation of vaccine status’ and that the COVID-19 vaccines did not reduce all-cause mortality, but rather produced genuine spikes in all-cause mortality shortly after vaccination.
The Backlog of Unregistered Deaths..
Bridgen went on to highlight a critical failure in how data on deaths are being collected.
‘There is a total failure to collect (never mind publish) data on deaths that are referred for investigation to the coroner. Why does this matter? A referral means that it can be many months and given the backlog, many years, before a death is formally registered. Needing to investigate a cause of death is fair enough. Failing to record when the death happened, is not. Because of this problem, we actually have no idea how many people died in 2021, even now. The problem is greatest for the younger age groups, where a higher proportion of deaths are investigated. This data failure is unacceptable.’
Excess Deaths in the Younger Age Groups..
My investigative report into child deaths following Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine revealed there was an increase in deaths in the 0-14 age group, around the time the mRNA vaccine was authorised in children, 12-15 years of age.
...
Bridgen drew attention to the fact that in a judicial review on a decision to vaccinate younger children, the ONS shockingly refused in court to give anonymised details (which they admitted was statistically significant) on the increase in excess deaths observed in the second half of 2021, for young adolescent males. Bridgen made the point that potentially even more excess deaths would have been observed, if those referred to the coroner had been included.
Excess Deaths Observed in Heavily Vaccinated Countries..
In August 2023, fifteen EU Member States that recorded excess deaths, the highest rates were observed in Ireland (21.1 percent), Malta (16.9 percent), Portugal (12.7 percent) and the Netherlands (9.4 percent), according to Eurostat. It should be noted that, as of January 2023, Portugal had the highest COVID-19 vaccination rate in Europe having administered 272.78 doses per 100 people in the country, while Malta had administered 258.49 doses per 100.
Increase in Cardiac Arrests..
Bridgen stated:
‘Ambulance data for England provides another clue. Ambulance calls for life-threatening emergencies were running at a steady 2,000 calls per day until the vaccine rollout. From then they rose to 2,500 daily, and calls have stayed at that level since.’
...
NHS Key statistics: England, July 2023..
Category 1: An immediate response to a life-threatening condition, such as cardiac or respiratory arrest.
The Anomalies of the Pfizer Clinical Trial..
Bridgen shared the fact that:
Four participants in the vaccine group of the Pfizer trial died from cardiac arrest compared to only one in the placebo group. Overall there were 21 deaths in the vaccine group up to March 2021, compared to 17 in the placebo group. There were serious anomalies about the reporting of deaths in this trial, with the deaths in the vaccine group taking much longer to report than those in the placebo group. That is highly suggestive of a significant bias in what was supposed to be a blinded trial.
An Israeli study clearly showed an increase in cardiac hospital attendances among 18-39 year olds that correlated with vaccination not covid.
Australia, the Perfect Control Group..
Bridgen explained that Australia had almost no covid when vaccines were introduced making it the perfect control group.
The state of South Australia had only had 1,000 cases of covid in total across the whole population by December 2021, before omicron arrived. What was the impact of vaccination there? For 15-44 year olds, there were historically around 1,300 emergency cardiac presentations a month. With the vaccine roll-out to the under 50s, this rocketed reaching 2,172 cases in November 2021 in this age group alone, which was 67% more than usual.
Overall there were 17,900 South Australians who had a cardiac emergency in 2021 compared to 13,250 in 2018, a 35% increase. The vaccine must clearly be the No.1 suspect in this, and it cannot be dismissed as a coincidence. Australian mortality has increased from early 2021 and that increase is due to cardiac deaths.
How the Regulators Have Failed..
The regulators also missed the fact that in the Pfizer trial the vaccine was made for the trial participants in a highly controlled environment, in stark contrast to the manufacturing process used for the public – which was based on completely different technology. Just over 200 participants were given the same product that was given to the public, but not only was the data from these people never compared to those in the trial for efficacy and safety, but the MHRA has admitted that it dropped the requirement to provide this data. That means there was never a trial on the Pfizer product actually rolled out to the public, and that product has never even been compared to the product that was actually trialled.
The vaccine mass production processes use vats of Escherichia Coli and presents a risk of contamination with DNA from the bacteria, as well as bacterial cell walls, which can cause dangerous reactions. This is not theoretical; there is now sound evidence that has been replicated by several labs across the world that the mRNA vaccines were contaminated by significant amounts of DNA which far exceeded the usual permissible levels. Given that this DNA is enclosed in a lipid nanoparticle delivery system, it is arguable that even the permissible levels would have been too high. These lipid nanoparticles are known to enter every organ of the body. As well as this potentially causing some of the acute adverse reactions that have been seen, there is a serious risk of this foreign bacterial DNA inserting itself into human DNA. Will anyone investigate? No they won’t.
The BBC’s Role..
How ironic that the BBC has chosen to remain utterly silent on the issue of excess deaths, despite its ardent daily coverage of the Covid death toll.
In regards to vaccine injuries, the BBC took a far more proactive role. The public broadcaster took it upon itself to collaborate with Facebook to take down the online pages of Covid-19 vaccine injury groups, by drawing attention to the fact that these groups used carrot emojis to circumvent Big Tech censors.
The experimental covid vaxx is not safe nor effective.
Similar to the 2020 election in the US.
Seems like a lot of funny stuff has been observed. Makes you wonder.
Is that proof that the vaccines are killing people? No.
Is it proof that Joe Biden was elected through fraud? No.
But whenever you see so much funny stuff clustered around an important event, the least you can do is to perform a full investigation to see if something bad happened or if it’s all just some weird coincidence.
And when the Powerful People work really, really hard to make sure that no one carries out any sort of investigation, then that is just one more thing to put on the pile of “funny stuff” clustered around an important event.
The vaccine mass production processes use vats of Escherichia Coli and presents a risk of contamination with DNA from the bacteria, as well as bacterial cell walls, which can cause dangerous reactions. This is not theoretical; there is now sound evidence that has been replicated by several labs across the world that the mRNA vaccines were contaminated by significant amounts of DNA which far exceeded the usual permissible levels.
Injecting e. Coli DNA into people. What could possibly go wrong?
Seems like a lot of funny stuff has been observed. Makes you wonder. Is that proof that the vaccines are killing people? No. Is it proof that Joe Biden was elected through fraud? No.
But whenever you see so much funny stuff clustered around an important event, the least you can do is to perform a full investigation to see if something bad happened or if it’s all just some weird coincidence.
And when the Powerful People work really, really hard to make sure that no one carries out any sort of investigation, then that is just one more thing to put on the pile of “funny stuff” clustered around an important event.
It was never about science or health.
The Democrats, with the full support of RINOs who looked the other way, could only win the White House in 2020 with the cheat-by-mail-in ballots.
The only thing that could justify massive mail-ins was to make people believe that the Black Death was sweeping the country, and if you ventured outside to cast your vote, you would be risking your life.
The only way you will ever convince me that Basement Biden got 80 million votes is to audit the mail-ins and compare them with the signature on record. But apparently once the ballot was separated from the envelope, that could no longer happen. Fast forward to 2022, and mail-ins were used to cheat Kari Lake.
It will be the same with every MAGA candidate for high office from now on. The count will be slow-walked for a week until enough mail-ins are found to put the Democrat ahead by a nose. Why are there still massive mail-ins allowed when it has become clear that covid was no plague.
As a nation, we have got to primary the RINO traitors that are collaborating with the enemy. This needs to be done on every level, from dog catcher through the state legislatures to Congress.
The government going “Jim Jones” on their citizenry.
I agree that this is reminiscent of the 2020 election.
• Either side could be blowing smoke up our asses.
• Simply calling people deniers or antivaxxers implies that they are lying to us.
• We need credible people who understand the complex math and have access to the raw data interpret this. And do it in a public way such that at least their reputation would be on the line if we later find out otherwise.
• Basically we need a formal commission by congress to have experts on both sides testify as to what is going on.
This is simply not correct. I have not checked the UK, but the US profile of Excess Deaths of ALL CAUSES and various age cohorts is published and clear. It shows:
1) Essentially zero Excess Deaths for age 0-45, from 2020 through today. That means 2 things. First, that age range was never at risk of the virus. Second, the vax is not killing them. Zero is zero. No Excess Deaths.
2) There are small numbers of Excess Deaths from age 45-64, and the vast majority of that small number was age 60-64, and that was during primarily the Delta surge.
3) There were huge spikes of Excess Deaths of age 65-85 aligned with virus surges, particularly Delta, and there remains some residual Excess Death count for that age group.
4) Oddly, for 85+ there are now no Excess Deaths.
For God’s sake, you guys can be better than this. Stop reading other analyses. DO YOUR OWN. A google of Excess Deaths will take you to the raw data page where you can scroll way down, select “Weekly Deaths By Age” and Update Dashboard. Graphs appear for the various age groups and show what I have just described. GO DO YOUR OWN EXAMINATION. Stop this insanity of believing wackos.
If it was the vax, we would expect levelized excess deaths.
BUT
Almost NONE summers of 2021 and 2023!
COVID-19 is an allergic reaction to the SARS-2-CoV protein spikes found on the virus and on “normal cells” as a result of the mRNA “vaccine.”
...some weird coincidence.
When you get a little older you begin to realize there is no such thing as coincidence.
As I was driving home from work this afternoon,
CBS radio reported today that “experts” predict that heart attacks will increase in the coming decades due to..........
the weather.
Not a joke.
This ties right in ....
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
Oncologist: I’ve Never Seen Cancers Behaving Like This
Young people, in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, are developing aggressive and rapidly-growing “turbo cancers.”
@MakisMD
, who has diagnosed 20,000 cancer patients in his career, says, “I’ve never seen anything like this.”
“I’ve never seen stage four breast cancers presenting in women in their 20s. I’ve never seen stage four colon cancers presenting in men and women in their 20s [and] 30s. Leukemias that will kill you in a matter of days or even hours after diagnosis.”
https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1719135425195892895?s=20
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.