What does this sentence even mean? How could anyone know that their state election process had been corrupted *BEFORE* it had happened?
Only after the massive corruption was discovered could anything be done about it.
Please provide a single shred of evidence to support your claim that a state legislature "tried" to fix the election mess but was prevented from doing so.
Mastriano.
Clearly you don't bother keeping up with this topic to the extent you should to be able to discuss it reasonably.
There was nothing that prevented them from voting on a measure to withdraw the state's electors before the January 6th special session of Congress.
And you know this how?
I would assume that by January 5th, the legislators may have regarded it as too late to do anything about it. It should have convened in early November of 2020. By January, everything was already in motion and likely impossible to stop by their actions.
I don't know the details of what they thought, I am only surmising. Pennsylvania was not the only state that was having turmoil over corrupt elections. Arizona and Georgia also had efforts being made to fix their corrupt elections.
That's quite an audacious and arrogant statement to make, isn't it? LOL. To wit:
What does this sentence even mean? How could anyone know that their state election process had been corrupted *BEFORE* it had happened?
Just as one example ... the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was issuing rulings on various legal challenges to the state's questionable voting procedures as early as September 2020. Did you miss that one? The legislature should have stepped in as soon as these rulings came down that effectively extended voting deadlines, allowed ballot drop boxes, etc.
Mastriano.
I asked you to provide evidence that a state legislature attempted to fix the election mess, and you post the name of one guy. Nobody prevented him from doing anything. They just didn't listen to him, and he had no power do act on anything without the support of a majority in the PA Senate.
I would assume that by January 5th, the legislators may have regarded it as too late to do anything about it. It should have convened in early November of 2020. By January, everything was already in motion and likely impossible to stop by their actions.
Now that directly contradicts the other contention you've made on this thread (and others) ... that it would be better to do SOMETHING about the election fiasco -- even if it wouldn't legally change the result -- than to do nothing and just let it slide. Senator Tom Cotton explicitly stated that he would have upheld the objection of certifying the electors of any state where a person or government body with authority to act on behalf of the state in an official capacity had issued a formal statement opposing the method of selecting the electors that were in the hands of VP Pence. Nobody did any such thing.