But you said “Are you kidding? You really haven't been keeping up with these election fraud cases. Judges won't let them file any evidence. They argue firstly "no injury yet", and then they argue "standing", and finally they argue "laches.”
You said evidence wasn’t allowed to be introduced. Now you’ve pivoted to with any DC or Atlanta court.
There is massive evidence of election fraud. Judges wouldn't allow a suit to be filed (in most cases) with judicial excuse making, so no evidence got presented. Not the fault of the evidence.
DC Juries all work for the Federal government, and they *HATE* anyone who threatens to bring it more under the control of normal Americans. They will convict anyone the government prosecutors indict.
Atlanta is also a heavily Democrat city, and any jury from there will also convict on any claim made by their DA about Republicans. Evidence does not matter in Atlanta any more than it mattered in the OJ Simpson trial.
Again, I hope this helps you clarify whatever you were trying to say.