[DiogenesLamp]

You are going to have to clarify whatever it is you are trying to say. I will reiterate a few of my points if it helps.

There is massive evidence of election fraud. Judges wouldn't allow a suit to be filed (in most cases) with judicial excuse making, so no evidence got presented. Not the fault of the evidence.

DC Juries all work for the Federal government, and they *HATE* anyone who threatens to bring it more under the control of normal Americans. They will convict anyone the government prosecutors indict.

Atlanta is also a heavily Democrat city, and any jury from there will also convict on any claim made by their DA about Republicans. Evidence does not matter in Atlanta any more than it mattered in the OJ Simpson trial.

Again, I hope this helps you clarify whatever you were trying to say.

[del griffith]

You say there’s massive evidence. Ellis admitted there wasn’t. Now Meadows is echoing the same. Rudy still claims but hasn’t produced. While it’s early to file a lot of replies to the charges, team Trump really isn’t talking fraud as much as they are talking it doesn’t matter what was claimed and who the claims were made to but the had the right to or have presidential immunity today so. So in the end regarding evidence, Where’s the beef?

As for DC juries your view is a bit jaded. I will admit they lean more liberal, but that doesn’t guarantee a conservative conviction. But Trump could waive the jury. My guess is he’d rather razzle dazzle a jury.