Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Trump Judge Imposes Gag Order Preventing Trump From Calling Her Names
Front Page Magazine ^ | October 17, 2023 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 10/17/2023 1:08:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Can you legally prevent Trump from making ‘mean tweets’ about you. Sure, all you have to do is have a black robe courtesy of the ruling party.

A federal judge on Monday issued a gag order on former President Donald Trump, limiting what he can say about special counsel Jack Smith’s federal prosecution into his alleged attempt to subvert in the 2020 presidential election.

“This is not about whether I like the language Mr. Trump uses,” Judge Tanya Chutkan said. “This is about language that presents a danger to the administration of justice.”

“His presidential candidacy does not give him carte blanche to vilify public servants who are simply doing their jobs,” the judge added.

Vilifying “public servants” is probably the most fundamental civil right. It’s what distinguishes us from a monarchy or some sort of totalitarian system.

Judge Chutkan would like to be a monarch and has barred Trump from calling her names.

Citizens should be encouraged to vilify public servants.

In social media posts, Trump has attacked Chutkan as a “biased, Trump Hating Judge” and called Smith “deranged” and a “thug” as well as attacked individual members of his team.

“When you start to use a word like ‘thug’ to describe a prosecutor doing their job, that wouldn’t be allowed by any other criminal defendant,” Chutkan said. “Just because the defendant is running a political campaign does not allow him to do whatever he wants.”

She added: “If the message Mr. Trump wants to express is ‘my prosecution is politically motivated,’” he can do so without using “highly charged language.”

What exactly is the harm in calling Jack Smith a “thug”, is there more harm in it than in the things that the media has said about Trump. Or that Chutkan has said about Trump?

(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: danielgreenfield; greenfield; sultanknish; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2023 1:08:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

As long as he doesn’t do it in the courtroom, it’s none of their business.


2 posted on 10/17/2023 1:10:34 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That judge is such a crybaby!


3 posted on 10/17/2023 1:11:45 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The whole purpose of the 1st Amendment is so that we can call government officials names.


4 posted on 10/17/2023 1:13:11 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Gaetz should be dropping Articles of Impeachment for this Judge so Jim Jordan can get his first scalp the first week he is Speaker.


5 posted on 10/17/2023 1:14:33 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dear judge, I can read minds and I tell you he is thinking bad thoughts about you and that prosecutor!


6 posted on 10/17/2023 1:14:38 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Affirmative Action third-world African IQ Tanya Chutkanis a criminal thug!


7 posted on 10/17/2023 1:15:02 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Now Judge Tanya Chutkan openly gives aid and comfort to the domestic and foreign enemies of the United States.


8 posted on 10/17/2023 1:21:09 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That judge must be an ugly old hag


9 posted on 10/17/2023 1:21:24 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Judge Pig Vomit speaks!


10 posted on 10/17/2023 1:23:57 PM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

As long as he doesn’t intimidate a potential witness, he can say anything he wants.


11 posted on 10/17/2023 1:24:45 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
“This is about language that presents a danger to the administration of justice my ability to politically persecute somebody I don't like.”

Fixed.

12 posted on 10/17/2023 1:25:08 PM PDT by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Its going to be overturned. Prior Restraint is almost never granted. This is yet more evidence of this judge’s obvious bias and abuse of authority. This order is subject to interlocutory appeal....ie immediately they don’t have to wait til the end of the trial.


13 posted on 10/17/2023 1:26:13 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Chutkan has now committed the very crime the Founders sought to prevent: she has imposed prior restraint on speech.

And not just anyone’s speech: the former President of the United States.

She and Smith have one thing in mind: to silence him so that he cannot fight them politically.

There is no pursuit of justice here. Only a relentless push to convict at all costs.

In all seriousness this foreigner should never have let near ANY court in the United States. She comes from a country steeped in British autocratic judicial ideas, the very ones my ancestors fought.


14 posted on 10/17/2023 1:26:18 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where does the 1st Amendment stop & start?


15 posted on 10/17/2023 1:26:43 PM PDT by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She thinks she is king because she has a vagina and is black. We


16 posted on 10/17/2023 1:26:46 PM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Gag orders need to be limited by statute and made subject to a speedy appeal. Wake-up, legislators.


17 posted on 10/17/2023 1:32:33 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>> What exactly is the harm in calling Jack Smith a “thug”

It’s disrespectful to other thugs to associate them with this lowlife.


18 posted on 10/17/2023 1:32:36 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (I don’t see why they would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fine. I think President Trump should give Judge Chutkan a nickname like Judge Chupacabra and Jack Smith the nickname Jack Smack and only use those names. Trump could also do tag team of insult where one person just savagely insults the both of them six ways to Sunday and Trump just say “Amen brother!”


19 posted on 10/17/2023 1:32:48 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (The Forever War is a crime against humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But we can call her names and there are several I can think of.


20 posted on 10/17/2023 1:33:54 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson