Posted on 10/01/2023 3:31:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
By this “logic”, preventing kids under 17 from viewing R-rated movies at a theater is somehow a “violation of free speech rights” of the producers of the motion picture because their audience is being limited by an ‘arbitrary’ age limit. This has to get overturned on appeal. In the meantime, parents need to step in and simply withdraw their kids from any programs offering this garbage.
OK groomer
Yep. They have said so many times. Now it’s pretty obvious.
Why not stripper story hour? I would have loved that when I was in HS.
So schools can now take children to strip clubs. “Mommy, I need a bunch of 20’s for today’s field trip.”
OK. Bring hizzoner’s grandkids to one and see what he has to say about it.
Ok, it is painfully obvious the judge is a faggot. You cannot let such demented people hold power.
Only a Mentally ill parent would let their child go/see a drag show and if it’s happening without the parent consent then someone needs to be sued
Stop holding back, tell us what you really think.
It is illegal for a minor into a female exotic dancer. But can be forced to watch a male exotic dancer. Waiting for a female to identify as a male and perform as a cross dressing dancer.
Remember, it started out as they just wanted to get married. Now look how much they are grabbing for.
Good reply, thanks. They do need to tighten the bill. But a 56 page retort from the judge. Sounds like he has an agenda.
Wait until the backlash comes & OUR FREE SPEECH comes from the business end of a gun-—or rope.
They best get their affairs in order then.
Doesn’t matte so much who one appoints Judge many of them think after their in the robe comes with a crown.
And the fine print on reads lobbyist.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
“”It is not unreasonable to read SB 12 and conclude that activities such as cheerleading, dancing, live theater, and other common public occurrences could possibly become a civil or criminal violation.””
So, does this 84 year old moron think that all adult entertainment should be viewed by minors then? Or just the ones related to homosexual “”art””?
And why stop there? Why have limits on what minors can drink or do at all if it’s infringing on someone “else’s” right to freedom of expression? Hey, no holds barred. The sky’s the limit. Let it all hang out. Right Judge Hittner?
Hey David. You’re about to meet your maker in a few years, maybe sooner. Let’s hope, for your sake, that your creator feels the same about that “expressive content” as you do, eh?
Texas just needs to ban federal judges.
“Remember, it started out as they just wanted to get married. Now look how much they are grabbing for.”
It was always about the corruption of innocents. Remember the Boy Scouts fiasco, which the evils finally won. And now with the transgender thing. You let evil take one inch and it ends up taking your soul and that of all mankind, which is ultimate the goal.
Arkansas can require ID to access porn, thereby banning it for kids (and adults as well who simply won’t scan an ID) but Texas can’t do the same for in person smut?
Might be how they law was written though I suppose the judge is probably just a crackpot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.