Posted on 09/29/2023 1:45:18 AM PDT by CFW
It’s been called a device “from hell.” Intelligence experts once falsely insinuated it was Russian disinformation. And lawyers for the president's son this month even questioned if it really even exists.
Remarkably, the Hunter Biden laptop saga begun four years ago is turning the tables on the FBI, which now is being asked to return the now infamous device and its data to the origin point of a scandal that prompted an impeachment inquiry against the 46th president.
Lawyers for Delaware computer shop owner John Paul Mac Isaac this week subpoenaed America’s most famous law enforcement agency, demanding the bureau return the laptop, an associated hard drive and other data that it seized from him in December 2019, according to a copy of the subpoena obtained by Just the News.
The subpoena, dated Sept. 25, from the Superior Court of Delaware says Mac Isaac needs the device as evidence in his lawsuit against CNN, Politico and Hunter Biden alleging he has been defamed.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
I’m sure they’ll get right on that one.
Personally, I hope the FBI or DOJ say they can’t because the laptop contains classified information in violation of US laws..........oh that would be a crime as to how Hunter got hold of the classified information and documents.
What were Slow Joe’s fake email names he used, like everyone else in the Obama Administration and upper ranks of the Democratic Party? I wonder how many emails Hunter got from top level democrats through pseudonyms of Top Policy makers we know can identify?
I think that shop owner, the one with the four names, has left the country a few months ago, to escape the harassment of the Biden Administration.
It’s the centerpiece of a future Biden Crime Family Museum and Dementia / STD Testing Center.
That laptop has been wiped clean by the FBI.
And not just “with a cloth or something “.
They will be right on it. The HDD has already been “hitlary-ied” AKA SCRUBBED !!!
Delaware computer shop owner John Paul Mac Isaac is subpoenaing the FBI, demanding return of (a) the laptop,(b) an associated hard drive and (c) other data that it seized from him in Dec 2019.
The subpoena says Mac Isaac needs the device as evidence in his lawsuit against CNN, Politico WRT Hunter Biden’s whining about being defamed.
The only way they would ever get it back is after te FBI has totally wiped it and/or rendered it inoperable.
No way the FBI would ever allow the functionsl laptop with the evidence within to see the light of day.
That shop owner had better be prepared for tax audits going back 20 years. And when they find that he failed to declare $22 of interest income in 1998 The Big Guy’s Department of Just Us will charge him with 17 felonies.
Doesn’t everyone in law enforcement take a polygraph as part of their employment agreement? I think it is time to polygraph everyone in the DOJ.
Here are the ground rules:
You do not have to take the polygraph, but if you do not, you will be terminated immediately and lose all benefits.
You do not have to take the polygraph if you retire and agree to be deposed if your name comes up in any investigations.
You can take the polygraph and if you fail it, you will be fired for violating your employment agreement and possibly arrested for violating national security policies.
You can take the polygraph and pass it, ensuring future employment and possible promotion to a leadership role in the agency.
On the other hand it could be in x42’s sock drawer...
IIRC Rudy Guliani reported that laptop and its contents to the FBI. They ignored the report but Guliani itemized the items to them and referred to it all on the air on his radio show in NY.
yup...........
They’ll return it to the shop owner, then promptly arrest him for child pornography.
FBI will not comply, it’s an “ongoing investigation”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.