[DugwayDuke]

Sacajaweau wrote: “the big lie was that it would not stop your from getting it nor keep you from passing it on. The option was risk getting it...just like any other flu...with a 98% survival rate. If you were young....survival rate was 99.99999%”

Are you saying we shouldn’t have vaccinated the young for polio since the survival rate for polio was essentially the same?

[drSteve78]

Are you saying we shouldn’t have vaccinated the young for polio since the survival rate for polio was essentially the same?

Polio immunization uses a real vaccine, with real immunization effects. Not a fake ‘vaccine’ that is a manner of gene therapy, stimulates no antibody production, prevents no infection or transmission, and has many side effects.

[Ex-Con777]

>Are you saying we shouldn’t have vaccinated the young for polio since the survival rate for polio was essentially the same?<

The two viruses are completely different. Covid’s effect on the young is nearly zero. They can contract it and their immune system destroys it quickly with, believe it or not, a zero percent chance of a fatality.

Older people have a slightly higher chance of fatality but still statistically very low.

Your logic would require all women to get prostate exams and men to get pap smears.

Don’t blow smoke up my butt. I spent time in the hospital from the jab. I will not forget or forgive.

EC

[Sacajaweau]

We knew the vaccine worked. It had been tested over and over...mrna did not have the testing to give us enough information...and we KNOW they withheld inforamtion.

I was in one of the earliest groups to receive the polio vaccine. For years, my bro and I sold salt for a dime for the March of Dimes campaign.

Not about JUST the survival rate....it's about the testing, too.

[fr_freak]

Are you saying we shouldn’t have vaccinated the young for polio since the survival rate for polio was essentially the same?

The fear of polio was not just death but paralysis, and it hit the young the hardest. Even so, in retrospect, sanitation and hygiene probably did more to stop the spread, but either way, it is an entirely different situation than one in which the youth had virtually zero chance of permanent consequences from the virus but a significant chance of permanent consequences from the "vaccine".

Your logic, if that is really what you are using, is severely flawed, as usual. I don't expect to see this ridiculous assertion again.

[pghbjugop]

To question your question, polio screwed up a lot of people who got it and survived, that is the difference with polio.