Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joshua c

Apparently the Fed’s say they had a warrant.

But that is going to be interesting. Liberty sold the safe. They no longer had rights to it or possession.

I guess the question to be answered is….what right did they have in assisting the Fed’s over the ownership of the safe?

If they had a say in opening the safe then who really owned it?

Look at how Apple is with their phones.

Of course, if roles were reversed and the Fed’s went after a liberal, lawyers would be lined up across the state and protesters would be assaulting Liberty offices.

But those in the Right don’t have that kind of backup.


13 posted on 09/10/2023 2:41:22 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: qaz123

“Apparently the Fed’s say they had a warrant.”

They had a warrant allowing them to search the safe. But that does not empower them to go to the manufacturer and demand they perform work to open it.

The FBI can bring saws, crowbars, blowtorches, Vinnie the safecracker, etc. But the warrant in no way requires anyone else to help them gain entry... including the safe owner.

And Liberty is about to get sued. They gave out his combination without a court order or permission.


23 posted on 09/10/2023 3:05:42 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson