Posted on 09/05/2023 9:40:26 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Is Trump’s former White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, about to sing like a canary against his former boss? Politico writes that he “signaled that his defense is likely to include blaming the former president as the primary driver of the effort.”
Granted, it’s Politico, and they are not fans of Trump World. The online site relishes stories that pit the various players against each other. But, in this case, it is entirely plausible. Why would Meadows do time for Trump if he can strike a deal? Meadows has proven himself a political opportunist, in my opinion. He seems to be developing a storyline that he just went along with whatever Trump wanted. There was one story published that stated that Meadows went along with Trump because he didn’t want Trump to yell at him. Yikes. That’s not much of a profile in courage.
It’s not uncommon for co-defendants facing serious prison time to point fingers at each other to make themselves look less culpable to an eventual jury. But rarely has it played out in such an extraordinary fashion, where the alleged ringleader is a former president.
During a hearing in Atlanta, a defense attorney for Meadows called attention to Trump’s prominent role in what is certain to be a crucial element of prosecutors’ case there: the infamous Jan. 2, 2021, phone call in which Trump demanded that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, “find” enough votes to declare Trump the winner.
Meadows arranged that pivotal call. But after prosecutors played audio of the call in the courtroom, an attorney for Meadows emphasized that his client’s part in the actual discussion was both more minor and less provocative than Trump’s.
“There’s a lot of statements by Mr. Trump. Mr. Meadows’ speaking roles were quite limited,” Meadows’ lawyer, Michael Francisco, observed as he cross-examined Raffensperger, who was called to testify by prosecutors.
“He didn’t make a request that you change the vote totals — Mr. Meadows, himself?” Francisco continued.
“Correct,” Raffensperger replied.
Sounds like Raffensperger is his wingman.
The false electors figure prominently in the Georgia case. Meadows was clear in his testimony last week that Trump viewed the false electors as a significant part of his strategy to stay in power. Meadows sent an email pushing the campaign to put together those slates because, otherwise, he feared Trump would yell at him. In case the campaign won in its court actions, he wanted the slates ready to go.
There are indications that Trump will assert broad presidential immunity. The other co-defendants have already begun working their own advantages.
Many of the defendants in the Georgia case have already begun maneuvering for individual advantage. Chesebro’s lawyers demanded that his trial begin next month, which could have the effect of separating his trial from other big players like Trump or Rudy Giuliani. Others have asked to be tried alone, which could complicate their ability to point the finger at Trump but would also mean their jury wouldn’t hear from anyone specifically defending the former president.
Meadows pleaded not guilty and waived his arraignment. He avoided an appearance that will be broadcast live on TV in doing so. Meadows is asking to be tried in federal court, as he was a federal employee. Meadows is free on $100,000 bond. Meadows’ legal team doesn’t think he can get a fair trial in Fulton County.
It will be interesting to see how Meadows’ proceeds. Many of the other co-defendants are complaining that Trump isn’t helping with legal bills, which have to be devastating for most of them. Trump has shown this loyalty only goes one way – to himself – especially since he left office. Now he may reap some of what he has sown. We’ll have to stay tuned to see how it all shakes out. The Georgia trial will be televised. It will be must-see tv.
Very good you did not include the word Republic as in banana republics. We are just a banana if Biden is allowed to prosecute his opponent in next election.
It was nice knowing you USA which operated as constitutional Republic since George Washington was president.
I left Hot Air four years ago and will never go back.
Trump held a fundraiser for Rudy and the others.
Not a single actual “crime” anywhere in this article.
Didn’t I see them pushing this story a month or two ago?
Repeating it isn’t going to make it come true.
Trump is spending plenty of money on his own court issues. Why would anyone think he should pay for anyone else’s
For those believers in the judicial system, let me share an insight known well to experienced judges and lawyers. A criminal case can be rigged for conviction in ways that are hard to overturn on appeal. A determined and unethical prosecution with a compliant judge can constrain the defense, fashion a superficially strong case, and pack the jury with members inclined to convict.
Small unspoken signs of favor and disfavor by a judge can also easily prejudice even a fair and neutral jury. All it takes is for the judge to look interested and have a slight smile when the prosecution puts on their case, but then to lean back and frown when the defense puts witnesses on and speaks. In an intimidating environment with a challenging task, even honest jurors tend to look to the judge for signs of how they should assess the case before them. Good judges know this and are utterly neutral and unreadable in court room manner.
Since none of that normally appears on the record, defense attorneys have to challenge the judge and put the signs of prejudice on the record. Most attorneys would rather chew off their thumbs than do that because they know that even an eventual favorable ruling on appeal will risk wide dislike of them by other judges.
I hope some investigative reporter starts digging into his harem. He was known in DC to hire young pretty girls as his assistants. He could be their father or even their grandfather, which creeps me out.
That's only when a Republican is doing the questioning. If THEY do it, it's "democracy", and perfectly legal.
It’s better than nothing but a few hundred thousand compared to 10s of motion legal fees is not much
In Rudy’s case it’s Trump that owes him money
I prefer mine stage 3.
Sing about what? No crime was committed.
Trump is holding fundraisers at his New Jersey club for Rudy.
That’s great but Trump owes Giuliani several million dollars over his work after the 2020 election and so far reports are Trump is refusing to pay him
Mark Meadows ... another dis-appointment
If he pays him now, it would look like witness tampering. The fundraisers are dinners for the donor class. I’m sure they’ll raise a substantial sum of money.
politico is most likely a mockingbird led production. That means it hates Trump most of the time and than pretends to be fair and balanced some of the time. Don’t trust a thing they do.
Trump said flipping ought to be illegal. i don’t know about that but any flipped testimony should be thrown out of court.
Unless Rudy flips on Trump, he wouldn’t be a witness and I don’t how it would be considered tampering.
Trump is paying the legal bills of some of the other defendants, what I can’t figure why is Rudy one of the exceptions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.