1 posted on
09/01/2023 7:31:03 AM PDT by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: lowbridge
This 14th ammendment nonsense is just that, and whackadoo judge who would rule in favor of it would be struck down on appeal.. it’s a joke of an argument and has no merit. Dems can venue shop all they like. Any ruling they would get will be struck down as there is no way such a ruling would not get appealed all the way to the Supreme Court if need be and it would not stand.
This is just attempted election tampering, nothing more.
To: lowbridge
So for once that “lack of standing” factor works in our favor. About time.
To: lowbridge
Excellent! Kudos to this judge, who took her oath of office seriously.
66 posted on
09/02/2023 4:13:38 AM PDT by
popdonnelly
(All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
To: lowbridge
68 posted on
09/02/2023 3:52:32 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: lowbridge
cognizable
I like that word.
70 posted on
09/04/2023 1:18:29 PM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: lowbridge
71 posted on
09/04/2023 1:21:37 PM PDT by
sauropod
(I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
To: lowbridge
72 posted on
09/06/2023 4:04:01 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: lowbridge
“an individual citizen does not have standing to challenge whether another individual is qualified to hold public office.”
In the ruling, the judge also cited prior precedent, in which plaintiffs weren’t able to keep candidates off the ballot because of their association
《》《》《》《》
Nice.
A judge making a good ruling.
👍
73 posted on
09/06/2023 10:06:03 PM PDT by
Syncro
(#ListlessVessel )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
