It seems DJT wants to make the GA indictment a freedom of speech issue (perfect phone call) - and I think he will be fine on that regard, but how does a grand jury see evidence and decide hey there’s something here? Said another way, I think there’s more to it than just Trump’s phone call. I could be very wrong here, but do some believe it’s just about him leaning on Raffensberger? I just can’t see that and if you know something I don’t, let me have it!
For openers, indictment by grand jury is NOT PROOF OF GUILT.
Second, any decision in lower courts is subject to appeals to higher courts, all the way to supreme court.