Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Finds Gun Ban on Illegal Drug Users is Unconstitutional
AmmoLand ^ | August 14, 2023 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 08/23/2023 4:53:41 AM PDT by marktwain

On August 9, 2023, a three-judge panel of the United States District Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found the federal ban on the possession of firearms by people who use marijuana to be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

The case is  USA v. Daniels.  Daniels was pulled over for driving without a license plate in April 2022. One of the two officers was a Drug Enforcement Administration agent. That officer recognized the smell of marijuana. The two officers found several marijuana cigarette butts, a 9mm pistol, and a semi-automatic rifle in the vehicle. During questioning, Daniels admitted he was a regular user of marijuana. He was not tested for drug use. He was not asked if he was using marijuana at the time. The officers did not state Daniels appeared intoxicated. From the court opinion:

Based on his admission, Daniels was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which makes it illegal for any person “who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance . . . to . . . possess . . . any firearm.”An “unlawful user” is someone who uses illegal drugs regularly and in some temporal proximity to the gun possession. See United States v. McCowan, 469 F.3d 386, 392 (5th Cir. 2006).

While Daniels was under indictment, the Supreme Court decided Bruen. It clarified that firearms regulations are unconstitutional unless they are firmly rooted in our nation’s history and tradition of gun regulation. See 142 S. Ct. at 2129–30. Daniels immediately moved to dismiss the indictment, claiming that § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional under that new standard.


(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; constitution; drugs
The historical record shows, some few states had laws which forbid shooting guns while intoxicated. There is no record of removing an individual's right to keep and bear arms simply because they used an intoxicant at some time.
1 posted on 08/23/2023 4:53:41 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Question G on the Federal Form 4473

“”Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?
Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized
for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.

Half the state of California and Michigan are going to lie on that question, this is a good decision IMHO.


2 posted on 08/23/2023 5:04:14 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This has to be correct. It’s been made “unconstitutional” to keep them from voting.


3 posted on 08/23/2023 5:08:36 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Say anything you like. Just don't say anything you don't like." - Old communist proverb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Agreed. Solid.


4 posted on 08/23/2023 5:50:25 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson