Skip to comments.
A Pennsylvania study suggests links between fracking and asthma, lymphoma in children
Channel 3000 News/AP ^
| August 16, 2023
| AP Staff
Posted on 08/16/2023 8:08:29 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
"Meanwhile, the researchers said their findings on preterm births and birth weights among families living closer to gas wells echoed the mixed conclusions in similar studies. There were hints that gas production might reduce birth weights by less than an ounce on average."
Well, of COURSE it does! ANYTHING to stop America from being energy independent!
To: All
Remind me. Who was President then?
2
posted on
08/16/2023 8:10:08 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: Diana in Wisconsin
ROTFLMFAO!!!
Utter BS to the nth degree.
But the Clot Shot is “safe & effective”.
These people need to be in an insane asylum.
3
posted on
08/16/2023 8:13:14 AM PDT
by
lgjhn23
("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
To: Diana in Wisconsin
you know at this point I wonder if DDT was really bad and if asbestos is really bad.
4
posted on
08/16/2023 8:14:19 AM PDT
by
Jaysin
(Trump can’t be beat, unless the democrats cheat)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Another government grant BS study. Jackasses who conduct “studies” should be required to pay for them with a GoFundMe page not the American worker’s wages that were stolen from them. Most “studies” have a political cause being pimped. Stop wasting our money!
5
posted on
08/16/2023 8:15:46 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
("There's no cryin' in baseball and there's no ethics in politics!" )
To: Diana in Wisconsin
6
posted on
08/16/2023 8:16:04 AM PDT
by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie. )
To: Diana in Wisconsin
The researchers found what they were determined to find, and picking and choosing the data is the only way to do what.
I can do that kind of research myself, and whatever I need to prove, I will. It’s just a matter of not including the data which might disprove my intended result. It’s the new scientific method, which also includes consensus.
7
posted on
08/16/2023 8:17:04 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: Jaysin
DDT is not a “bad” thing, and the commies made our retarded government ban it.
Asbestos is factually a bad thing, and that cannot be denied due to empirical evidence in the lungs of those affected by it.
8
posted on
08/16/2023 8:23:12 AM PDT
by
Pox
(Eff You China. Buy American!)
To: Jaysin
The answer to both of those questions, based on overall cost vs. benefit to humanity, would be a resounding NO.
To: adorno
the new scientific methodFirst draw the curve, then plot the points, and finally gather the data.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
The taxpayer-funded research by the University of Pittsburgh adds to a body of evidence suggesting links between the gas industry and an increased likelihood of neutron star collisions in distant galaxies.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
I suggest a link between consuming leftist drivel and early onset dementia.
To: adorno
O2 can kill you.
So can dirt.
And rocks.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Yes sir!!!
I grew up where a lot of these wells are located. The proximity to people is far from them.
This is BS to the nTH degree!!!
See, WE HAVE TO STOP DRILLING!!!
IT’S FOR THE CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!! what a joke!
14
posted on
08/16/2023 8:36:37 AM PDT
by
bantam
To: Jaysin
you know at this point I wonder if DDT was really bad and if asbestos is really bad.DDT was not the culprit Rachel Carson made it out to be. Silent Spring was thoroughly debunked by real scientists. Even the New York Times called her out for junk science back in 2007.
15
posted on
08/16/2023 8:52:04 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
To: HartleyMBaldwin
First draw the curve, then plot the points, and finally gather the data.
With the democrats' scientific method, gathering the data is 'optional' or not required, or, they make it up. Making it up is most of what they do. If making up the data was banned, there would be no climate-change agenda at all.
16
posted on
08/16/2023 8:53:31 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...

Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
17
posted on
08/16/2023 9:02:07 AM PDT
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
Causation - correlation requires TRUE science.
My causation:
I drop my car keys in the driveway and within 2 days we get rain. When I want rain I now go out to my driveway and throw my car keys at the ground. Works every time.
To: adorno
Perhaps “create” would have been a better word than “gather”. Or maybe “manipulate”.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
correlation is not causation
20
posted on
08/16/2023 9:21:12 AM PDT
by
Wuli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson