It is just a gut feeling, but what if she is being somewhat less than forthright?
Posted on 08/15/2023 9:05:11 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Sometime in the next three weeks, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is expected to ask a grand jury to indict multiple people for trying to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election result.
July 31 is the first of 10 days between now and August 18 that Willis has instructed most of her staff to work remotely, citing safety precautions.
That window comes as U.S. Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith is preparing to bring criminal charges stemming from his federal investigation into the Jan, 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Willis says the two investigations have not coordinated.
“I don’t know what Jack Smith is doing and Jack Smith doesn’t know what I’m doing,” Willis told WABE in a Saturday interview. “In all honesty, if Jack Smith was standing next to me, I’m not sure I would know who he was. My guess is he probably can’t pronounce my name correctly.”
Former President Donald Trump, who is also a focus of the Fulton County probe, received a target letter in the federal investigation, suggesting an indictment may be imminent in that case.
There is Fani Willis on record two weeks ago denying she was in contact with Jack Smith. HOWEVER, liberals (including John Dean) are now saying she must be in contact with Jack Smith to coordinate their scheduling. Unfortunately Willis can't say that she was in contact with Smith to do trial coordination because she already FIRMLY DENIED being in contact with Smith.
Guess what bitch! There is no way you can hide this! There is not one thing that cannot be found out!
I guarantee they will find out she has been CLOSELY coordinating with Jack Smith (and prove she is a LIAR). This is flat out ELECTION INTERFERENCE. Trump's legal team need to go to the Supreme Court with this and stop ALL these phony trials, coordinated by Jack Smith, at least until AFTER the 2024 election.
Oh, of course not.
They just got the multitude of counts in before the first Republican debate.
But that’s just coincidence.
And she’ll never be indicted for HER texts in a conspiracy, so all is well.
Sorry, beeyutch, but your lips moved.
+1000!
It depends on who does the indicting!
Fed cases usually are prioritized. Fanni may have to sit on it.
Liberals right now, after Willis failed to answer whether she was coordinating with Jack Smith last night, are trying to cover for her by saying but of course they are coordinating but just in order to keep from stepping on each other’s trials. Problem is Willis has already FIRMLY DENIED being in contact at all with Smith. Oh, and how could they have been coordinating on trial schedules if the indictment wasn’t even handed down until last night by the grand jury?
Why should it even mention that 🤔
I would think it still counts if there is a go-between person.
Well, good to know. Nothing to see, move along. Everything is above board.
And I have a bridge for sale.
Your lips are moving ...
“she already FIRMLY DENIED being in contact with Smith.”
Not a problem for them. They likely work any scheduling issues through a 3rd party who communicates with all the Trump prosecutors.
Fani Willis OnlyFans.
I watched her last night........a horrible woman
They want a fight in front of that court house......don’t give it to them.
It is just a gut feeling, but what if she is being somewhat less than forthright?
“nfortunately Willis can’t say that she was in contact with Smith to do trial coordination because she already FIRMLY DENIED being in contact with Smith.”
If someone working for Freeman is in contact with someone working for Smith, technically Freeman and Smith are not in contact personally. Perhaps an enterprising “journalist” should ask if anyone working in in Freeman’s office has been in contact with anyone working in Smith’s office and if so how frequently.
Remember, Dems are masters at parsing words and sentences. Remember her the impeachment of Bill Clinton? Contending his statement that “there’s nothing going on between us” had been truthful because he had no ongoing relationship with Lewinsky at the time he was questioned, Clinton said, “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement.”
Will 3 Justices recuse? (because Trump appointed them)
She wasn’t under oath when she said it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.